Three types of rescue can avert extinction in a changing environment
Ruth A. Hufbauer,Marianna Szűcs,Emily Kasyon,Courtney Youngberg,Michael J. Koontz,Christopher Richards,Ty Tuff,Brett A. Melbourne
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1504732112
IF: 11.1
2015-08-03
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Abstract:Significance Preventing extinction of small populations in rapidly changing environments is crucial to long-term preservation of diversity, because the creation of large reserves is often not feasible. An option immediately available to managers is bringing migrants in to increase size or improve genetic composition of populations at risk. We experimentally manipulate different types and combinations of migrants to evaluate which will be most effective in rescuing populations from extinction. We find that migration of numerous individuals can reduce the probability of extinction. However, migration of just a few genetically distinct individuals both reduces probability of extinction and dramatically increases fitness and population size. We suggest managers with limited conservation resources should prioritize genetic rescue over increasing demographic size for small populations.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?