Abstract:Studies advancing the hypothesis of a "gender-equality paradox" have found that societies with more gender equality demonstrate larger gender differences across a range of phenomena. In doing so, they rely on that practice of predicting an algebraic difference score—calculated from mean scores for men and women across a set of countries—with an index of gender equality or some related concept. We argue that direct difference score predictions of this type are impossible to interpret because very different combinations of constituents—mean scores of men and women and properties of these means—can produce identical direct difference score predictions. We reanalyzed three large cross-cultural data sets with 15 variables from three different domains—attitudes toward science and technology, economic preferences, and personality traits—to showcase our method of deconstructing difference score predictions and to investigate to what extent the rhetoric of the gender-equality paradox describes a real phenomenon. The results were highly heterogeneous. For some characteristics, men's and women's country-level means varied identically as a function of country-level gender equality (no paradox). For other characteristics, there were differences in how men's and women's means varied. Whether these differences could be described in the rhetoric of the paradox varied. More pertinent is the necessity of deconstructing difference score predictions into their constituent components before attempting to answer questions regarding a paradox. It is in the terminology of these components and their properties that future hypotheses should be tested. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

Why call it ‘equality’ when it should be ‘achievement’? A proposal to un-correct the ‘corrected gender gaps’ in the EU Gender Equality Index

The Gender Equality Index and the Gender Gaps for EU Countries

Towards a European Union Gender Equality Index

The European Gender Equality Index: Conceptual and Analytical Issues

Introducing the Historical Gender Equality Index

Towards a Fresh Start in Measuring Gender Equality: A Contribution to the Debate

Gender equality index for country regions

Proposing a regional gender equality index (R-GEI) with an application to Italy

Economic Benefits of Gender Equality in the EU

Methodological Issues: Gender related Indices

A Gender Equality Index for the Italian Regions

GENDER EQUALITY INDEX OF THE AUTONOMOUS COMMUNITIES OF SPAIN: A MULTIDIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS

An Extended Regional Gender Gaps Index (eRGGI): Comparative Measurement of Gender Equality at Different Levels of Regionality

Deconstructing the gender-equality paradox.

Unveiling gender inequality in the US: Testing validity of a state-level measure of gender inequality and its relationship with feminist online collective action on Twitter

The Institutional Basis of Gender Inequality: The Social Institutions and Gender Index (SIGI)

Measuring Gender Inequality in Great Britain: Proposal for a Subnational Gender Inequality Index

Overcoming gender bias in the digital economy. Empirical evidence for European countries

Synthesizing explanations behind global gender (in)equality: Identifying the gaps and moving forward with more economic history

Gender Inequality is negatively associated with academic achievement for both boys and girls