Abstract:By about 14 months of age, English infants show sensitivity to mispronunciations of consonants and vowels of familiar and newly learnt words when asked to identify a referent. They are also capable of learning two similar-sounding words. These ?ndings suggest that infants possess phonologically detailed representations of words. However,very little is known about the role that tones play in early lexical representations. Word meaning is also distinguished by tones, which consist primarily of pitch level or contour variations in tonal language, like Chinese. While in English, a typically non-tonal language, pitch change only plays a role in the phrasal level as intonation. This study aims to answer the question: Do 16-month-old Chinese and English infants treat tones as phonological information in their lexical representations? Using the intermodal preferential looking paradigm with the mispronunciation task, study 1 examined whether Chinese infants at 16 months were sensitive to mispronunciations of tones in monosyllabic, familiar words. 15 infants were separated into two groups. For group 1, the familiar words were pronounced correctly in block1, while mispronounced with the falling tone in Mandarin (T4) in block 2. The block order was reversed for the infants in group 2. Using a similar task to study 1, study 2 investigated whether English infants at 16 months were sensitive to tonal change in familiar English words when asked to identify a referent. In contrast with study 1, all the 12 infants received one kind of block order. In block 1, the words were pronounced with T4 as the familiar tone. A falling pitch contour is common in English and quite similar to T4 whereas it is less common to pronounce words with a fall-rise contour in English. Therefore, the dipping tone in Mandarin (T3) was used as the novel tone in block 2 and were considered as tone mispronunciations in study 2. The results of study 1 showed that Chinese infants in group 1 looked longer at a target object when its label was correctly pronounced than when the label was mispronounced, in other words, a mispronunciation effect was found. In group 2, there were no systematic difference in infants' preferences for the target between the pre- and the post-naming phase, neither when the target label was mispronounced or pronounced correctly. The results of study 2 showed that English infants looked longer at a target object when its label was pronounced with T4 than when the label was pronounced with T3. A positive correlation was found between English infants' receptive vocabulary size and their performance in the mispronunciation condition. In conclusion, the results indicate that 1) tones interact with phonological information for both Chinese and English infants at 16 months of age; 2) 16-month-old English infants may be on the way of learning to eliminate the phonological specificity of tone.

The Name-Pronunciation Effect: Further Evidence from Chinese

The Effect of Pronunciation on Interaction Between Bi-languages at Lexical Level

Phonological Specificity of Lexical Tones in 12-Month-old Chinese-speaking Infants

Phonological Specificity of Tones in Early Lexical Representation at 16 Months of Age

Three-year-old Tone Language Learners Are Tolerant of Tone Mispronunciations Spoken with Familiar and Novel Tones

Name Writing in Mandarin-speaking Children

The Interaction Effect of Pronunciation and Lexicogrammar on Comprehensibility: A Case of Mandarin-Accented English

Pinyin or No Pinyin: Does Access to Word Pronunciation Matter in the Assessment of Chinese Learners’ Vocabulary Knowledge?

End-word tones of stock names and stock price anomalies: Empirical evidence from China's IPO markets

Phonology and access to Chinese character meaning.

Cognate translation priming with Chinese-Japanese bilinguals: No effect of interlingual phonological similarity

Language Nonselective Access to Phonological Representations: Evidence from Chinese–English Bilinguals

Auditory event-related potentials based on name stimuli: A pilot study

The neural mechanisms underlying the processing of consonant, vowel and tone during Chinese typing: an fNIRS study

Translating Brand Names Effectively: Brand Attitude Reversal and Perceived Brand Name Translation Relevance in an Emerging Market

The Impact of Familiarity on Naming Variation: A Study on Object Naming in Mandarin Chinese

How Dialects of Chinese Language Influence L1-Speakers Phonological and Phonetic Acquisition of English

Comparison of Pronunciation Scores in Spoken Language Learning System

Social priming of speech perception: The role of individual differences in implicit racial and ethnic associations.

Psycholinguistic predictors of naming accuracy and decline in bilingual logopenic primary progressive aphasia: a cross-linguistic case study

Can sequencing of articulation ease explain the in–out effect? A preregistered test