Abstract:BACKGROUND Antisocial personality features in adolescents are frequently associated with delinquency and constitute the problem that most concerns the criminal justice system and the public. Hostile interpretation bias has been identified as a candidate for explaining emergent adolescent antisocial personality problems and aggression, but it is unclear whether offenders and non-offenders show differences in the relationships between hostile interpretation bias, aggression and antisocial personality features. AIMS To compare relationships between hostile interpretation bias and a personality measure between incarcerated teenagers and first year university students and to explore aggression and criminal history as mediating or moderating variables. METHODS Fifty-three 16-18-year-old incarcerated male offenders and 69 17-20-year-old male university students were recruited, the former through institutional staff and the latter by online advert only. Individuals in both groups self-rated, in private, on the Word and Sentence Association Paradigm-hostile (WSAP), The Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire (AIHQ), Hostility Interpretation Bias Task (HIBT) as tests for hostile interpretation bias, and on the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire and on Hyler's Personality Disorder Questionnaire (PDQ-4). Among the students, criminal history was assessed by a self-reported binary question. LASSO regressions were used to test inter-relationships between hostile interpretation bias and aggression or antisocial personality traits. Mediation and moderation were tested using MPLUS 7.4. RESULTS The WSAP and AIHQ, as measures of self-reported hostility bias, had relationships with self-reported aggression (Pearson r 0.24-0.58, p < 0.001) and with antisocial personality features (r 0.36-0.50, p < 0.001), the HIBT did not. Aggression scores mediated the relationship between hostile interpretation bias and antisocial personality features. Furthermore, the relationship between hostile interpretation bias and aggression was stronger among the young offenders (estimates 0.43-0.75) than among the university students without criminal history (estimates 0.13-0.36). CONCLUSIONS Hostile interpretation bias appears to promote antisocial personality features by increasing an individual's aggression, regardless of social status, although the effect was much stronger among the young offenders. To reduce young people's antisocial personality features, future studies should perhaps focus on evaluating strategies to reduce hostile bias or prevent it from being expressed in aggressive behaviours.

Measuring Hostile Interpretation Bias

Evaluating the Reliability of the Word-Sentence Association Paradigm (WSAP) as an Interpretation bias Assessment across Ethnoracial Groups

Measures of hostility as predictors of facial affect during social interaction: Evidence for construct validity

Validation of a new assessment of hostile attribution bias in romantic relationships: The Hostile Attributions in Romantic Relationships Test

The Relationship Between Hostile Interpretation Bias and Symptoms of Depression and Social Anxiety: a Replication Across Two Samples

Adaptation and validation of a suicide-focused Word Sentence Association Paradigm to assess suicide-specific interpretation biases

A Brief Measure of Positive and Negative Interpretation Biases: Development and Validation of the Ambiguous Social Scenarios Questionnaire

The impact of patients' hostile attribution bias on aggression in doctor-patient interactions

Components of Hostility and Verbal Communication of Emotion

The Relationship Between Hostile Attribution Bias and Aggression and the Mediating Effect of Anger Rumination

Hostility and Perceptions of Support in Ambiguous Social Interactions

The Ambiguous Cue Task: Measurement reliability of an experimental paradigm for the assessment of interpretation bias and associations with mental health

Hostile attributional biases in severe alcohol use disorder: replication, gender specificity, and mechanistic insights

Hostility, anger expression, cardiovascular responsivity, and social support

An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility.

Analyze This! Thematic Analysis: Hostility, Attribution of Intent, and Interpersonal Perception Bias

The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism.

Psychometric Properties of the Brief Symptom Inventory Hostility Subscale in Patients With Heart Failure

A comparison of the role of aggression in the association between hostile interpretation bias and antisocial personality features between young offenders and university students.

Gender differences in sensitivity to provocation and hostile attribution bias toward ambiguous facial cues in violent offenders and community-based adults

Relationships Between Hostile Attribution Bias, Negative Urgency, and Reactive Aggression