Abstract:<div> The announced goal of reversing the European trend toward a declining land carbon sink has garnered much ink. Words can, however, be misleading. Annual additions/contributions (sinks) to the land carbon sink (stocks) from growing forest and increasing forest cover have slowed marginally in recent years. However, the existing European land forest sink (stocks) has (have) expanded continuously across most or all of the 20th century and on into the 21st. More importantly perhaps, EU Member states with significant long-term investments in the forestry sector have historically witnessed strong forest expansion and notmerely with the initiation of international attention to climate change mitigation through the UNFCCC negotiating and climate commitment framework. In this context, frequent assaults on forestry from multiple directions are cause for some bewilderment. We first highlight weaknesses in claims of increased forest use intensity and illustrate that forestry in the Nordic countries has a remarkably small and stable footprint over the 20th and 21st centuries. Addressing the second problem, however, understanding why such attacks occur in the first place, is more complex. Methodologically speaking, challenges to forestry should presumably be balanced by an understanding of the many human welfare benefits forests and the practice of forestry currently provide, as well as the costs of relinquishing those practices. Perhaps due to strong preferences among NGO&#8217;s and in parts of the academic community for natural, untouched, biodiverse forests, the benefits of forestry and forest resource use are consistently under-appreciated. Striking a balance between the desire for natural and biodiverse-rich forest environments on the one hand, and the climate change mitigation (and adaptation) benefits of forestry, forest resource use and substitution on the other is presumably a political and socio-economic necessity. The real question may be to what extent bias in favor of the &#8220;natural&#8221; may ultimately disrupt real, measurable progress toward effective climate change mitigation? Continuous, positive mitigation-related contributions to the growing European land cover sink (stocks), as well as to the global carbon budget (through annual net removals and substitution), have been and should remain the norm. These goals ultimately require an aggressive EU LULUCF strategy capable of fully mobilizing forest and forest resource use in favor of the goal of climate change mitigation (and adaptation). </div>

Is there a Nordic Model for the treatment of introduced tree species? A comparison of the use, policy, and debate concerning introduced tree species in the Nordic countries

Assessing the Potential for Assisted Gene Flow Using Past Introduction of Norway Spruce in Southern Sweden: Local Adaptation and Genetic Basis of Quantitative Traits in Trees

Comparative conclusion on forest-related nature conservation policy in China and Germany: A shared scientific perspective of middle-range policy

Sweden does not meet agreed national and international forest biodiversity targets: A call for adaptive landscape planning

Using Norway spruce clones in Swedish forestry: Swedish forest conditions, tree breeding program and experiences with clones in field trials

Potential impact of albedo incorporation in boreal forest sector climate change policy effectiveness

Genomic Data Provide New Insights on the Demographic History and the Extent of Recent Material Transfers in Norway Spruce

Challenges and Solutions for Forest Biodiversity Conservation in Sweden: Assessment of Policy, Implementation Outputs, and Consequences

The challenge of combining timber production and biodiversity conservation for long-term ecosystem functioning—A case study of Swedish boreal forestry

Balancing Risks and Benefits: Stakeholder Perspective on Managing Non-Native Tree Species in the European Alpine Space

Moose or spruce: A systems analysis model for managing conflicts between moose and forestry in Sweden

The potential of non-native tree species to provide major ecosystem services in Austrian forests

The genetic and economic gains from forest tree breeding programmes in Scandinavia and Finland

Combining scientific and local knowledge improves evaluating future scenarios of forest ecosystem services

The extent of historic translocation of Norway spruce forest reproductive material in Europe

Do tree species affect decadal changes in soil organic carbon and total nitrogen stocks in Danish common garden experiments?

Reversing the European Trend Toward a Declining Land Carbon Sink?

Silvicultural management in maintaining biodiversity and resistance of forests in Europe-temperate zone

Comparing the local use of environmental policy instruments in Nordic and Baltic countries ‐ the issue of diffuse water pollution

Positioning the Nordic Countries in European Union Environmental Policy

Active recreational and silvicultural co-use of forested areas: an innovative forest management study