Abstract:Background: In recent years, there has been a proliferation of third-party Web-based services available to consumers to interpret raw DNA from direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies. Little is known about who uses these services and the downstream health implications. Identifying this hard-to-reach population of consumers for research raised questions about the most effective recruitment methods to undertake. Past studies have found that Web-based social media survey distribution can be cost-effective for targeting hard-to-reach populations, yet comparative efficacy information across platforms is limited. Objective: The aim of this study was to identify the most effective Web-based strategies to identify and recruit the target population of direct-to-consumer genetic testing users who also made use of third-party interpretation services to analyze their raw genetic data. Web-based survey recruitment methods varying by social media platform and advertising method were compared in terms of cost-effectiveness and demographics of survey respondents. Methods: A total of 5 Web-based survey distribution conditions were examined: 4 paid advertising services and 1 unpaid service. For the paid services, a 2x2 quasi-experimental design compared social media platforms (Facebook vs Twitter) and advertising tracking metrics (by click vs by conversion). The fifth unpaid comparison method consisted of study postings on the social media platform, Reddit, without any paid advertising. Links to identical Web-based versions of the study questionnaire were posted for 10 to 14 days for each of the distribution conditions, which allowed tracking the number of respondents that entered and completed the questionnaire by distribution condition. Results: In total, 438 individuals were recruited to the study through all conditions. A nearly equivalent number of participants were recruited from paid campaigns on Facebook (n=159) and Twitter (n=167), with a smaller sample recruited on Reddit (n=112). Significantly more participants were recruited through conversion-tracking (n=222) than through click-tracking campaigns (n=104; Z=6.5, P<.001). Response rates were found to be partially driven by organic sharing of recruitment materials among social media users. Conversion tracking was more cost-effective than click tracking across paid social media platforms. Significant differences in terms of gender and age distributions were noted between the platforms and between the tracking metrics. Conclusions: Web-based recruitment methods were effective at recruiting participants from a hard-to-reach population in a short time frame. There were significant differences in the effectiveness of various paid advertising techniques. Recruitment through Web-based communities also appeared to perform adequately, yet it may be limited by the number of users accessible in open community groups. Future research should evaluate the impact of organic sharing of recruitment materials because this appeared to play a substantial role in the observed effectiveness of different methods.

Can 23andMe have it all?

Health and Kinship Matter: Learning About Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing User Experiences via Online Discussions

Risky Business: Risk Perception and the Use of Medical Services among Customers of DTC Personal Genetic Testing

An Interactive Resource to Probe Genetic Diversity and Estimated Ancestry in Cancer Cell Lines

"23andMe confirms: I'm super white" -- Analyzing Twitter Discourse On Genetic Testing

Third-Party Genetic Interpretation Tools: A Mixed-Methods Study of Consumer Motivation and Behavior

Memorable messages about genes and health: implications for direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic tests and therapies

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing in the news: a descriptive analysis

Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing on Social Media: Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis of YouTube Users' Comments

The impact on clinical success from the 23andMe cohort

American Gut: an Open Platform for Citizen Science Microbiome Research

"And We Will Fight For Our Race!" A Measurement Study of Genetic Testing Conversations on Reddit and 4chan

Characterizing Participants in the ClinSeq Genome Sequencing Cohort as Early Adopters of a New Health Technology

Genomics in Personalized Nutrition: Can You “Eat for Your Genes”?

An analysis of direct-to-consumer genetic testing portals and their communication of health risk and test limitations

Evaluating the Analytical Performance of Direct-to-Consumer Gut Microbiome Testing Services

Everyone Is a Tomato: Metagnostic Narratives of Genetic Revelation

The Search for Consumers of Web-Based Raw DNA Interpretation Services: Using Social Media to Target Hard-to-Reach Populations

Ancestry and phenotype predictions from touch DNA using massively parallel sequencing

A survey on awareness, knowledge and preferences toward genetic testing among the United States general public

Personalized Skincare: Correlating Genetics with Skin Phenotypes through DNA Analysis