A multi-center analysis of visual outcomes following open globe injury
Jason A. Greenfield,Davina A. Malek,Shruti Anant,Michael Antonietti,Alessandro Jammal,Alicia Casella,Sarah C. Miller,Kristine Wang,Bita Momenaei,Karen Lee,Hana A. Mansour,Grant A. Justin,Kevin G. Makhoul,Racquel A. Bitar,Alice C. Lorch,Grayson W. Armstrong,Taku Wakabayashi,Yoshihiro Yonekawa,Fasika Woreta,Kara Cavuoto
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67564-y
IF: 4.6
2024-07-20
Scientific Reports
Abstract:The purpose of this study was to examine how demographics, etiology, and clinical examination findings are related to visual outcomes in subjects with open globe injury (OGI) across a large and generalizable sample. A retrospective cohort analysis was performed using data collected from the electronic medical records of four tertiary university centers for subjects with OGI presenting from 2018 to 2021. Demographic information, injury mechanisms, clinical exam findings, visual acuity (VA) at presentation and most recent follow-up were recorded. In subjects with bilateral OGIs, only right eyes were included. A modified ocular trauma score (OTS) using presenting VA, the presence of perforating injury, OGI, and afferent pupillary defect was calculated. The risk of subjects' demographic characteristics, ocular trauma etiology, clinical findings and modified OTS on the presence of monocular blindness at follow-up were assessed using univariable and multivariable regression models. 1426 eyes were identified. The mean age was 48.3 years (SD: ± 22.4 years) and the majority of subjects were men (N = 1069, 75.0%). Univariable analysis demonstrated that subjects of Black race were 66% (OR: 1.66 [1.25–2.20]; P < 0.001) more likely to have monocular blindness relative to White race at follow-up. OTS Class 1 was the strongest predictor of blindness (OR: 38.35 [21.33–68.93]; P < 0.001). Based on multivariable analysis, lower OTS category (OTS Class 1 OR: 23.88 [16.44–45.85]; P < 0.001) moderately predicted visual outcomes (R 2 = 0.275, P < 0.001). OGI has many risks of poor visual outcome across patient groups that vary by demographic category, mechanism of injury, and clinical presentation. Our findings validate that a modified OTS remains a strong predictor of visual prognosis following OGI in a large and generalizable sample.
multidisciplinary sciences