Corporate Scandals, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Equity Prices
C. L. Brown,S. Thapa
Abstract:ABSTRACT Recently, a series of corporate scandals has hit the U.S. financial markets. The improper accounting practices of such large and well known companies as Enron, WorldCom, Xerox, Merck, and Bristol Myers has shaken investors ' confidence in the financial markets thereby shaking the very foundation of a free enterprise system. In response, the U.S. Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and President Bush signed the Act into law on July 30, 2002. This study investigates the stock market reaction to the signing of this Act into law. We detect a significant positive stock price reaction to this event, indicating that investors believe the Sarbanes-Oxley law will provide for better corporate governance in the future. INTRODUCTION Recently, several corporate scandals have rocked the U.S. financial markets. Starting with the debacle of Enron, many more scandals have come to light. For example, WorldCom overstated cash flows by recording $3.8 billion in operating expenses as capital expenditure and later on admitted another $3.3 billion in revenue was improperly booked. Similarly, Adelphia Communications overstated revenues by inflating capital expenses and hiding debt. They backed a $3.1 billion loan to the Rigas family, founders of Adelphia Communications. Bristol Myers inflated its 2001 revenue by $1.5 billion, Qwest communications admitted that it incorrectly accounted for $1.3 billion in sales and will restate results for 2000-2002, and Xerox misstated financial results for 5 years boosting income by $1.5 billion and is restating financiais dating back to 1997 (see Patsuris, 2002 for the scandal sheet). A sample of the well publicized, high profile cases are shown in Table 1. These are all well known large public companies. Their improper accounting practices and, in some cases fraudulent reporting, has shaken investors' confidence in the stock market. In order to improve corporate governance and restore investors' confidence in the stock markets, President Bush signed into law the Sarbanes Oxley Act on July 30, 2002. This Act contains the most far reaching reforms of American business practices since the time of Franklin Delano Roosevelt (Miller and Pashkoff, 2002). The purpose of this study is to investigate the stock market reaction to the passage of this Act into law. Although, there have been numerous articles written on the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, no rigorous econometrics investigation of the stock market reaction to the passage of Sarbanes-Oxley Act has appeared in the literature to date. Since the passage of the Act into law introduces sweeping reforms in corporate governance, this type of econometrics study enhances the Finance literature. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 This Act significantly changes federal regulation of public company corporate governance and reporting obligations, and tightens accountability standards for directors, officers, auditors, securities analysts and legal counsel. The Act has eleven provisions (titles) and impacts many of the parties involved in capital formation process - management, auditors, accountants, security analysts, attorneys and regulators. Its key provisions are: * establishes Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). The PCAOB is an independent, nongovernmental and non-profit organization and its purpose is to oversee the audits of public companies, * imposes specific requirements for audit committee. The audit committee must consist solely of independent directors, * CEO/CFOs must certify financial statements stating that the reports fairly present the company's financial and operating results. Penalties can be up to $5 million and/or up to 20 yrs in prison for false certification, * prohibits loans to executive officers, * requires real-time disclosure of information useful to investors and requires more detailed financial information and other disclosures in SEC filings, * changes the deadline for insiders to report trading in company's securities to within two business days of the transaction, * requires issuers to review their relationship with their auditors to ensure continued independence, * imposes more stringent rules for U. …
Law,Business,Economics