Assessment of a panel of interleukin-8 reporter lung epithelial cell lines to monitor the pro-inflammatory response following zinc oxide nanoparticle exposure under different cell culture conditions

Linda C. Stoehr,Carola Endes,Isabella Radauer-Preiml,Matthew S. P. Boyles,Eudald Casals,Sandor Balog,Markus Pesch,Alke Petri-Fink,Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser,Martin Himly,Martin J. D. Clift,Albert Duschl
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-015-0104-6
2015-09-29
Particle and Fibre Toxicology
Abstract:BackgroundStably transfected lung epithelial reporter cell lines pose an advantageous alternative to replace complex experimental techniques to monitor the pro-inflammatory response following nanoparticle (NP) exposure. Previously, reporter cell lines have been used under submerged culture conditions, however, their potential usefulness in combination with air-liquid interface (ALI) exposures is currently unknown. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare a panel of interleukin-8 promoter (pIL8)-reporter cell lines (i.e. green or red fluorescent protein (GFP, RFP), and luciferase (Luc)), originating from A549 lung epithelial type II-like cells cells, following NPs exposure under both submerged and ALI conditions.MethodsAll cell lines were exposed to zinc oxide (ZnO) NPs at 0.6 and 6.2 μg/cm2 for 3 and 16 hours under both submerged and ALI conditions. Following physicochemical characterization, the cytotoxic profile of the ZnO-NPs was determined for each exposure scenario. Expression of IL-8 from all cell types was analyzed at the promoter level and compared to the mRNA (qRT-PCR) and protein level (ELISA).ResultsIn summary, each reporter cell line detected acute pro-inflammatory effects following ZnO exposure under each condition tested. The pIL8-Luc cell line was the most sensitive in terms of reporter signal strength and onset velocity following TNF-α treatment. Both pIL8-GFP and pIL8-RFP also showed a marked signal induction in response to TNF-α, although only after 16 hrs. In terms of ZnO-NP-induced cytotoxicity pIL8-RFP cells were the most affected, whilst the pIL8-Luc were found the least responsive.ConclusionsIn conclusion, the use of fluorescence-based reporter cell lines can provide a useful tool in screening the pro-inflammatory response following NP exposure in both submerged and ALI cell cultures.
toxicology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the ability of a group of lung epithelial cell lines with interleukin - 8 (Interleukin - 8, IL - 8) reporter genes to trigger pro - inflammatory responses after exposure to zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) under different cell culture conditions (i.e., submerged conditions and air - liquid interface conditions). Specifically, the study aims to compare the responses of these reporter cell lines to ZnO NPs under the two culture conditions to determine their effectiveness and applicability as an alternative method for monitoring nanoparticle - induced inflammatory responses. In addition, the study also explores whether these reporter cell lines can be a useful alternative to more complex experimental techniques, such as quantitative reverse - transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT - PCR) and enzyme - linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), thereby reducing workload and improving detection efficiency. The paper addresses the above problems through a series of experimental designs, including cytotoxicity tests, reporter gene activity analysis, mRNA expression level detection, and IL - 8 protein release measurement, etc., to comprehensively evaluate the performance of different reporter cell lines under the two exposure conditions. The ultimate goal is to provide a fast, simple, and effective tool for screening pro - inflammatory responses caused by nanoparticle exposure, especially in the field of inhalation toxicology.