EXTRACORPOREAL CARDIAC SHOCK WAVE THERAPY IN TREATMENT OF ISCHAEMIC HEART FAILURE
Peng Yun-Zhu,Guo Tao,Li Rui-Jie,Yang Hong-Wen,Zhou Ping,Wang Yu,Luo Zhi-Ling,Gu Yun,Pan Jia-Hua,Yang Ping,Guo Tao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302920j.2
IF: 5.7
2012-01-01
Heart
Abstract:ObjectivesPrognosis of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) patients with contraindication of percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting remains poor. Extracorporeal cardiac shock wave therapy (CSWT) was reported to improve outcome of IHD in previous short-term studies. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficiency of CSWT in patients with ischemic heart failure.MethodsThirty-two patients with ischaemic heart failure and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (<50%) were randomised to CSWT (200 shots/spot at 0.09 mj/mm2 for 9–16 spots, 9 times within 3 month/series, n=18) and control group (exactly same procedures without shock wave energy, n=14). Dual isotope simultaneous acquisition single-photon emission CT with 99m Tc-sestamibi/18F-fluorodeoxyglucose was performed before randomisation and at 3 month after CSWT/control to locate and evaluate viable myocardium region. Follow-ups were performed at 0, 3 and 12 months after the therapy. Canadian cardiovascular society classification (CCS), New York Heart Association classification (NYHA), Seattle Angina Questionnaire, 6-min walk test, LVEF, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD), the dosage of nitroglycerin use and the changes of plasma level of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) were compared between two groups at each time point. Study design was approved by the hospital Ethical Committee and consent forms were obtained from all patients.ResultsAmong 32 patients enrolled, 30 (94%) completed 12-months9 follow-up (1 died from sudden death at 1 month, another withdrew because of unwillingness). No procedural complications or adverse effects were noted. At 3 months after CSWT, compared the control group, summed perfused score (−1.93±0.11 vs −0.54±0.09, p=0.02) and summed metabolic score (−1.37±0.07 vs 0.14±0.05, p=0.01) were much better in CSWT group. At 3 and 12 months after the therapy, patients in CSWT group experienced more improvement in symptoms compared to control group: NYHA (−0.48±0.03 vs 0.06±0.02, p<0.001; −0.52±0.02 vs −0.22±0.01, p=0.03, at 3 and 12 months respectively), CCS (−0.82±0.01 vs 0.16±0.03, p<0.001; −0.75±0.04 vs −0.12±0.02, p=0.01), Dosage of nitroglycerin (−1.10±0.03/week vs −0.11±0.02/week, p=0.02; −1.30±0.01/week vs 0.06±0.01/week, p<0.001) and 6-min walk test (m) (18.23±2.13 vs 8.16±1.05, p=0.01; 20.03±3.33 vs −1.85±2.10, p<0.001). Changes in Seattle Angina Questionnaire were much better in CSWT group (4.27±0.76 vs 1.16±0.48, p=0.01; 5.22±0.59 vs −1.04±0.52, p<0.001). More improvements of LVEF (%) (3.72±0.36 vs −0.29±0.06, p=0.01; 4.03±0.74 vs 0.13±0.05, p=0.01) and BNP (−62.88±12.55 vs −23.28±7.45, p=0.02; −69.51±9.87 vs −19.09±5.12, p=0.01) were also observed.ConclusionsCSWT improved symptom, cardiac function, quality of life and exercise tolerance in ischaemic heart failure patients compared to control group in our study. This new therapy could be considered as a new, non-invasive, safe and efficient strategy for patients with stable ischaemic heart failure.