Abstract:Abstract Ethically , behavior analysts are required to use the least aversive and restrictive procedures capable of managing behaviors of concern. This article introduces and discusses a multi-element paradigm for devising support plans that include ecological, positive programming, and focused-support proactive strategies for reducing the frequency of problem behavior occurrence. It also includes reactive strategies, i.e., separate independent variables. In this paradigm, reactive strategies are aimed solely at getting rapid, safe control over the incident, thereby reducing measured and quantified episodic severity. Behavior analysts who publish in mainstream behavioral journals do not always make it explicit how they, in fact, successfully employed non-aversive reactive procedures to achieve rapid/safe control over the severity of a behavioral incident. Three examples of published studies in the behavioral literature which successfully, though only implicitly, used non-aversive reactive strategies (NARS) to reduce the severity of the behaviors of concern are described. The multi-element paradigm discussed in the present article is illustrated by the support plans that address the challenging behavior of three children in a pre-school setting, using both proactive and reactive strategies. Reactive strategies were used for the purpose of reducing episodic severity (ES) and proactive strategies were aimed at reducing the frequency of occurrence. Following a comprehensive functional analysis and assessment (CFA) and the implementation of a multi-element behavior support (MEBS) plan, results show successful outcomes without the need for any aversive or restrictive procedures. When addressing severe behaviors of concern, in addition to reducing behavioral occurrence, safety should also be improved by reducing ES as a measured outcome and as a function of the reactive strategies employed, including in many cases, the use of strategic capitulation, i.e., providing the identified reinforcer for the target behavior.

A Proposed Model for Selecting Measurement Procedures for the Assessment and Treatment of Problem Behavior

Needed independent and dependent variables in multi-element behavior support plans addressing severe behavior problems

The Problem of Measurement Model Misspecification in Behavioral and Organizational Research and Some Recommended Solutions.

The Role of Behavior Observation in Measurement Systems for Randomized Prevention Trials

FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF PROBLEM BEHAVIOR: A REVIEW

Considerations of Baseline Classroom Conditions in Conducting Functional Behavior Assessments in School Settings

Stimulus Avoidance Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review

Comparison of Descriptive Assessment and Trial-Based Functional Analysis as the Basis of Treatment in Homes

What Gets Measured Gets Done: How Mental Health Agencies can Leverage Measurement-Based Care for Better Patient Care, Clinician Supports, and Organizational Goals

The Training and Validation of Behavior Observation and Description Skills

Measurement-Based Care: A Practical Strategy Toward Improving Behavioral Health Through Primary Care

Consent and Assent Practices in Behavior Analytic Research

Behavioral Treatments in Autism Spectrum Disorder: What Do We Know?

Examining the measurement precision of behavior problems among a sample of primarily rural youth on juvenile probation and their parents

A Behavior Analytic Perspective on Treatment of Problem Gaming and Problem Social Media Use

Measurement Informed Care in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

Rationale, Development, and Description of a Brief Family-Centered Service Provision Model for Addressing Children’s Severe Behavior

Producing meaningful improvements in problem behavior of children with autism via synthesized analyses and treatments

A component analysis of ABC assessments as demonstrated through function based interventions

Concordance between patient-centered and adaptive behavior outcome measures after applied behavior analysis for autism

Using Additional Analyses to Clarify the Functions of Problem Behavior: An Analysis of Two Cases