Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production

Marshall Burke,Solomon M. Hsiang,Edward Miguel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15725

IF: 64.8

2015-10-21

Nature

Abstract:Economic productivity is shown to peak at an annual average temperature of 13 °C and decline at high temperatures, indicating that climate change is expected to lower global incomes more than 20% by 2100.

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The effects of weather conditions on economic growth: Evidence from global subnational economic output and income

Richard S.J. Tol,Jinchi Dong,Jinnan Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3334030/v1

2023-01-01

Abstract:Abstract The effects of weather on economic growth continue to be debated. Previous studies focused on economic output, but income better reflects living standards; income and output are the same at the national level, but differ at a finer spatial scale. This study assembles a unique database comprising global subnational GDP and GDI per capita data from over 1600 regions across more than 180 countries and analyzes the effects of weather conditions on economic growth. The results reveal the following: 1) There is a significant negative effect of annual mean temperature on GDI per capita growth, while weather conditions do not significantly affect GDP per capita growth. 2) We find significant interaction effects between weather and weather variability, as well as different adaptations between rich and poor regions. 3) The omission of data from a large number of poor and hot countries in previous subnational research leads to an underestimation of the economic impact of weather shocks. Focusing on output rather than income and omitting data, previous studies appear to have underestimated the impact of climate change.
The Change of Global Temperature Affected by Global Economy

Fan Yue,Xia Wu,Linxi Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54097/hset.v48i.8228

2023-01-01

Abstract:Global warming is the most serious environmental problem due to rising temperatures. Previous studies showed CO2 is the primary greenhouse gas. CO2 emission is caused by the burning of fossil fuels. Humans pursue industrial growth at the expense of releasing CO2 into the atmosphere. Economic development is represented by Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The growth of CO2 emission increases more and more and does not reach the peak. The global temperature is facing a 2˚C crisis. The global emissions and global economy have a strong indication of relative sensitivity. We found out that countries with higher GDP emit more CO2. Individuals who have higher GDP per capita emit more CO2 to the atmosphere. GDP has a positive correlation with global temperature. Climate change is one of the biggest inequalities around the world. Richer countries caused more damage to global warming, but poor countries suffer more from global warming’s damage. GDP per capita has a positive correlation with temperature and CO2 emissions. The development of a country has a trend of increasing CO2 emissions at an early stage and decreasing CO2 emissions at a later stage. Total GDP although cannot positively correlated to CO2 emissions, but multicollinearity tests proved the two variables are related.
China Feels the Heat: Negative Impacts of High Temperatures on China's Rice Sector

Xiaoguang Chen,Shuai Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12267

2018-01-01

Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics

Abstract:We analysed a county‐level data set of single‐season rice yield and daily weather outcomes in China to examine the effects of temperature on China's rice sector. We found that rice yield exhibited highly nonlinear responses to temperature changes: rice yield increased with temperature up to 28°C and decreased sharply with higher temperatures. Holding current growing seasons and regions constant, average rice yield in China is projected to decrease by 10–19 per cent by 2050 and 11–33 per cent by 2070 due to future warming under the global climate models HadGEM2‐ES and NorESM1‐M. These results imply that future warming poses a major challenge for Chinese rice farmers and that the effectiveness of adaptations will depend on how well they reduce the negative temperature impacts on rice yield because of very hot days.
Day-to-day temperature variability reduces economic growth

Maximilian Kotz,Leonie Wenz,Annika Stechemesser,Matthias Kalkuhl,Anders Levermann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00985-5

IF: 30.7

2021-02-08

Nature Climate Change

Abstract:Elevated annual average temperature has been found to impact macro-economic growth. However, various fundamental elements of the economy are affected by deviations of daily temperature from seasonal expectations which are not well reflected in annual averages. Here we show that increases in seasonally adjusted day-to-day temperature variability reduce macro-economic growth independent of and in addition to changes in annual average temperature. Combining observed day-to-day temperature variability with subnational economic data for 1,537 regions worldwide over 40 years in fixed-effects panel models, we find that an extra degree of variability results in a five percentage-point reduction in regional growth rates on average. The impact of day-to-day variability is modulated by seasonal temperature difference and income, resulting in highest vulnerability in low-latitude, low-income regions (12 percentage-point reduction). These findings illuminate a new, global-impact channel in the climate–economy relationship that demands a more comprehensive assessment in both climate and integrated assessment models.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,meteorology & atmospheric sciences
Is temperature adversely related to economic development? Evidence on the short-run and the long-run links from sub-national data

Daniel Meierrieks,David Stadelmann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107758

IF: 12.8

2024-07-13

Energy Economics

Abstract:We examine the effect of rising temperatures on regional economic development, using annual sub-national data for over 1500 regions in 152 countries between 1990 and 2017. In a panel setting with region- and country-year fixed effects, we find no evidence of a homogeneous or heterogeneous effect of rising temperatures on economic development as measured by regional per capita income. Additionally, we find no non-linear relationship between temperature and economic development. We also employ a long-difference approach that is attuned to exploring the long-run relationship between rising temperatures and regional income. Results indicate that rising temperatures have a negative long-run impact on regional per capita income for a minority of regions located in countries with weak economic, legal and political institutions. Furthermore, these vulnerable regions experience a decline in long-term population and human capital development. The use of alternative regional per capita GDP data from 1950 onwards yields similar empirical results. Our findings suggest that negative economic effects of temperature increase with time, only becoming apparent in the long run for regions in already disadvantaged countries. Thus, country-specific conditions may moderate regional economic vulnerability to future temperature increases due to global climate change.

economics
The Economic Geography of Global Warming

José-Luis Cruz,Esteban Rossi-Hansberg

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdad042

2023-04-05

Abstract:Abstract Global warming is a worldwide and protracted phenomenon with heterogeneous local economic effects. We propose a dynamic economic assessment model of the world economy with high spatial resolution to assess its consequences. Our model features several forms of adaptation to local temperature changes, including costly trade and migration, local technological innovations, and local natality rates. We quantify the model at a 1∘×1∘ resolution and estimate damage functions that determine the impact of temperature changes on a region’s fundamental productivity and amenities conditional on local temperatures. Welfare losses from global warming are very heterogeneous across locations, with 20% losses in parts of Africa and Latin America but also gains in some northern latitudes. Overall, spatial inequality increases. Uncertainty about average welfare effects is significant but much smaller for relative losses across space. Migration and innovation are shown to be important adaptation mechanisms. We use the model to study the impact of carbon taxes, abatement technologies, and clean energy subsidies. Carbon taxes delay consumption of fossil fuels and help flatten the temperature curve but are much more effective when an abatement technology is forthcoming.

economics
The impact of temperature on labor productivity——evidence from temperature-sensitive enterprises

Wei Zhang,Ning Ding,Yilong Han,Jie He,Na Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1039668

IF: 5.411

2023-01-04

Frontiers in Environmental Science

Abstract:Climate change increases the frequency of extreme climate events and impacts the economy and the society in a negative way. As typical climate events, temperature anomalies affect individual health and working conditions, particularly for industries that depend heavily on temperatures. Using a research setting of Chinese temperature-sensitive enterprises, we analyze the impact of temperature on labor productivity. The findings indicate an inverse U-shaped relationship between temperature and labor productivity, with labor productivity peaking at 24.90°C on average. Further analysis shows that labor productivity peaks in the eastern regions at a higher level (26.25°C) than in the central and western regions (20°C). Moreover, we note that technological innovation is crucial for enterprises to manage climate risks and maintain effective labor productivity. This study provides empirical evidence on the relationship between environmental risk and corporate operations, shedding light on the significance of corporate sustainable development against accelerating global climate change.

environmental sciences
The Effects of Temperature on Labor Productivity

Wangyang Lai,Yun Qiu,Qu Tang,Chen Xi,Peng Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-101222-125630

IF: 6.6171

2023-06-20

Annual Review of Resource Economics

Abstract:This article reviews recent economic studies on the causal effects of temperature on labor productivity. The negative effects of extreme temperatures are widespread, and the magnitudes of the impact differ across social and economic factors. In addition to physical outputs, extreme temperatures also impair mental productivity, including cognition and learning. In utero exposure to extreme temperatures has profound effects on human development. Although the literature has detected various adaptation strategies, the conclusions are mixed. We discuss some limitations of existing studies and propose several directions for future research. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Resource Economics, Volume 15 is October 2023. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

economics,environmental studies,agricultural economics & policy
Contrasting influences of biogeophysical and biogeochemical impacts of historical land use on global economic inequality

Shu Liu,Yong Wang,Guang J. Zhang,Linyi Wei,Bin Wang,Le Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30145-6

IF: 16.6

2022-05-05

Nature Communications

Abstract:Abstract Climate change has significant implications for macro-economic growth. The impacts of greenhouse gases and anthropogenic aerosols on economies via altered annual mean temperature (AMT) have been studied. However, the economic impact of land-use and land-cover change (LULCC) is still unknown because it has both biogeochemical and biogeophysical impacts on temperature and the latter differs in latitudes and disturbed land surface types. In this work, based on multi-model simulations from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6, contrasting influences of biogeochemical and biogeophysical impacts of historical (1850–2014) LULCC on economies are found. Their combined effects on AMT result in warming in most countries, which harms developing economies in warm climates but benefits developed economies in cold climates. Thus, global economic inequality is increased. Besides the increased AMT by the combined effects, day-to-day temperature variability is enhanced in developing economies but reduced in developed economies, which further deteriorates global economic inequality.

multidisciplinary sciences
Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to U.S. crop yields under climate change

Wolfram Schlenker,Michael J. Roberts

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906865106

IF: 11.1

2009-09-15

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract:The United States produces 41% of the world's corn and 38% of the world's soybeans. These crops comprise two of the four largest sources of caloric energy produced and are thus critical for world food supply. We pair a panel of county-level yields for these two crops, plus cotton (a warmer-weather crop), with a new fine-scale weather dataset that incorporates the whole distribution of temperatures within each day and across all days in the growing season. We find that yields increase with temperature up to 29° C for corn, 30° C for soybeans, and 32° C for cotton but that temperatures above these thresholds are very harmful. The slope of the decline above the optimum is significantly steeper than the incline below it. The same nonlinear and asymmetric relationship is found when we isolate either time-series or cross-sectional variations in temperatures and yields. This suggests limited historical adaptation of seed varieties or management practices to warmer temperatures because the cross-section includes farmers' adaptations to warmer climates and the time-series does not. Holding current growing regions fixed, area-weighted average yields are predicted to decrease by 30–46% before the end of the century under the slowest (B1) warming scenario and decrease by 63–82% under the most rapid warming scenario (A1FI) under the Hadley III model.

multidisciplinary sciences
Climate change and economic prosperity: Evidence from a flexible damage function

Rodolphe Desbordes,Markus Eberhardt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2024.102974

IF: 4.6

2024-05-01

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Abstract:The damage function used to assess the economic impact of secular changes in temperature is one of the most speculative components of integrated assessment models of climate change. Existing work informing this debate is based on pooled empirical models incorporating limited non-linearity and giving little regard to dynamics. We use aggregate and agricultural data for 151 countries over the past six decades to estimate dynamic heterogeneous models which (a) allow the weather-output nexus to differ freely across countries, (b) help distinguish short-run from long-run effects, and (c) account for unobserved time-varying heterogeneity. Overall, we find that, in low-income or high-temperature countries, a permanent 1 °C rise in temperature is associated with a fall in income per capita of about 1.3% in the short-run and 8.5% in the long run. These long-run effects are substantially larger than those commonly suggested in the literature.

economics,environmental studies,business
Climate Warming Effects on Income Polarization in China

Yefei Sun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-024-00638-x

2024-07-20

International Journal of Environmental Research

Abstract:Climate warming poses a serious threat to sustainable economic development in China. The impact of climate warming on income polarization is often overlooked. This study combines a neural network model and household electricity data to estimate income. Furthermore, a regression model is constructed to examine the nonlinear effect of temperature on income polarization. The study reveals that temperature is a significant factor of income polarization. The temperature range with the lowest income polarization is 21–27 °C, while other temperatures will significantly exacerbate income polarization. Heterogeneous effects of temperature on income polarization indicate that temperature has a greater impact on income polarization in economically underdeveloped areas. By the end of the century, climate warming could significantly exacerbate income polarization. The main reason may be that, against the backdrop of global warming, low-income groups have weaker adaptability compared to high-income groups, which exacerbates income polarization. The findings are significant for regulating income polarization under climate warming in China.

environmental sciences
Long-term Effects of Temperature Variations on Economic Growth: A Machine Learning Approach

Eugene Kharitonov,Oksana Zakharchuk,Lin Mei

2023-06-18

Abstract:This study investigates the long-term effects of temperature variations on economic growth using a data-driven approach. Leveraging machine learning techniques, we analyze global land surface temperature data from Berkeley Earth and economic indicators, including GDP and population data, from the World Bank. Our analysis reveals a significant relationship between average temperature and GDP growth, suggesting that climate variations can substantially impact economic performance. This research underscores the importance of incorporating climate factors into economic planning and policymaking, and it demonstrates the utility of machine learning in uncovering complex relationships in climate-economy studies.

General Economics,Machine Learning
Valuing the Global Mortality Consequences of Climate Change Accounting for Adaptation Costs and Benefits

Tamma Carleton,Amir Jina,Michael Delgado,Michael Greenstone,Trevor Houser,Solomon Hsiang,Andrew Hultgren,Robert E Kopp,Kelly E McCusker,Ishan Nath,James Rising,Ashwin Rode,Hee Kwon Seo,Arvid Viaene,Jiacan Yuan,Alice Tianbo Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjac020

IF: 19.013

2022-04-21

The Quarterly Journal of Economics

Abstract:Abstract Using 40 countries’ subnational data, we estimate age-specific mortality-temperature relationships and extrapolate them to countries without data today and into a future with climate change. We uncover a U-shaped relationship where extreme cold and hot temperatures increase mortality rates, especially for the elderly. Critically, this relationship is flattened by both higher incomes and adaptation to local climate. Using a revealed-preference approach to recover unobserved adaptation costs, we estimate that the mean global increase in mortality risk due to climate change, accounting for adaptation benefits and costs, is valued at roughly 3.2% of global GDP in 2100 under a high emissions scenario. Notably, today’s cold locations are projected to benefit, while today’s poor and hot locations have large projected damages. Finally, our central estimates indicate that the release of an additional ton of CO2 today will cause mortality-related damages of ${\$}$36.6 under a high-emissions scenario, with an interquartile range accounting for both econometric and climate uncertainty of [-${\$}$7.8, ${\$}$73.0]. These empirically grounded estimates exceed the previous literature’s estimates by an order of magnitude.
New damage curves and multimodel analysis suggest lower optimal temperature

Kaj-Ivar van der Wijst,Francesco Bosello,Shouro Dasgupta,Laurent Drouet,Johannes Emmerling,Andries Hof,Marian Leimbach,Ramiro Parrado,Franziska Piontek,Gabriele Standardi,Detlef van Vuuren

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01636-1

IF: 30.7

2023-03-23

Nature Climate Change

Abstract:Economic analyses of global climate change have been criticized for their poor representation of climate change damages. Here we develop and apply aggregate damage functions in three economic Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) with different degrees of complexity. The damage functions encompass a wide but still incomplete set of climate change impacts based on physical impact models. We show that with medium estimates for damage functions, global damages are in the range of 10% to 12% of GDP by 2100 in a baseline scenario with 3 °C temperature change, and about 2% in a well-below 2 °C scenario. These damages are much higher than previous estimates in benefit-cost studies, resulting in optimal temperatures below 2 °C with central estimates of damages and discount rates. Moreover, we find a benefit-cost ratio of 1.5 to 3.9, even without considering damages that could not be accounted for, such as biodiversity losses, health and tipping points.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,meteorology & atmospheric sciences
The nonlinear relationship between temperature changes and economic development for individual provinces in China

Ning Li,Kou Bai,Zhengtao Zhang,Jieling Feng,Xi Chen,Li Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018-2744-6

2019-01-04

Theoretical and Applied Climatology

Abstract:Increasing evidence shows that global warming has exerted important influence on the economies of societies in the past and will continue to have effects in the future. The provinces of China differ substantially in terms of their temperatures and their degrees of economic development. Therefore, discussion of the positive and negative effects of global warming on economic development at the provincial level is beneficial for determining the effects of global warming on economic development in different provinces, and this discussion also helps to answer the question of how to increase the resilience of economies to global warming. This paper studies the effects of annual average temperature changes on economic growth in the 31 provinces of China from 1978 to 2013 (here referred to as the historical period) and in the 5 typical provinces from 2010 to 2100 (here referred to as the future) under the RCP8.5 scenario. The results indicate that (a) from 1978 to 2013, economic growth exhibits a quadratic nonlinear response to local temperature in all provinces of China and that temperature has both positive and negative effects on the economic growth rates of different provinces. In addition, taking 23.37 °C as a threshold value, over 96% of the provinces display positive effects. (b) Under the RCP8.5 scenario, from 2010 to 2100, although the 5 typical provinces maintain trends reflecting economic growth, the average rate of growth is 80% lower than the value during the historical period. The purpose of this study is to draw the attention of the government to the implications of future global warming for the economic development of different provinces.

meteorology & atmospheric sciences
The Uneven Impacts of Climate Change on China's Labor Productivity and Economy

Mengzhen Zhao,Mengke Zhu,Yuyou Chen,Chi Zhang,Wenjia Cai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119707

IF: 8.7

2023-01-01

Journal of Environmental Management

Abstract:Climate change is considered to increase economic costs by worsening heat-related labor productivity loss. While extensive global and national research has been conducted on this topic, few studies have analyzed subnational and individual economic impacts, potentially weakening local governments' motivation to tackle climate change. Figuring out the most affected regions and labors could help climate policymakers to identify priority regions and sectors to allocate adaptation resources efficiently, and enhance stakeholder engagement. This study adopted a provincial Computable General Equilibrium model by distinguishing different labors and regions in modelling work to address the aforementioned gap. The study estimated economic costs at different level under three climate change scenarios (lower (SSP126), middle (SSP245), and higher (SSP585) warming scenario). Lowincome regions located in southwest part of China (such as Guangxi and Guizhou), would experience the largest economic loss, 3.4-7.1 times higher than high-income in China by 2100 under SSP245 scenario. Additionally, wages for labors highly sensitive to heat in these regions are expected to rise, for example, by an 8.3% rise in Guangxi, driven by the rising demand for these labors. Conversely, others would experience a significant wage decrease, especially those with less sensitivity (e.g., managers). Therefore, we recommended that national financial supports be allocated more to these most affected regions and that government encourage managers provide assistance to workers vulnerable to heat.
Global socioeconomic exposure of heat extremes under climate change

Jie Chen,Yujie Liu,Tao Pan,Philippe Ciais,Ting Ma,Yanhua Liu,Dai Yamazaki,Quansheng Ge,Josep Penuelas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123275

IF: 11.1

2020-01-01

Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract:Growing evidence indicates that the risk of heat extremes will increase as climate change progresses and create a significant threat to public health and the economy. Socioeconomic exposure is the key component for assessing the risk of such events. To quantify socioeconomic exposure to heat extremes for 2016-2035 and 2046-2065, we use the projections of five global climate models forced by using three representative concentration pathways (RCPs) and projections of population and gross domestic product (GDP), and we take into account the geographic change in the distribution in shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs). The exposure of the global population for 2046-2065 is the greatest under the RCP8.5-SSP3 scenario, up to 1037(+/- 164) x 10(9) person-days, and the global GDP exposure for 2046-2065 is greatest under the RCP2.6-SSP1 scenario, up to 18(+/- 2) x 10(15) dollar-days. Asia has the highest exposure among all continents for both population and GDP, accounting for over half of the global exposure. Africa has the largest increase in exposure, with the annual population and GDP exposures increasing by over 9- and 29-fold, respectively, compared with the base period (1986-2005). The effect of climate makes the dominant contribution (47%-53%) globally for the change in population exposure. Changes in the geographic distribution of GDP cause nearly 50% of the total change in GDP exposure for 2016-2035. Mitigating emissions of greenhouse gases, either at the level of the RCP2.6 scenario or at a more ambitious target, is essential for reducing socioeconomic exposure to heat extremes. In addition, designing and implementing effective measures of adaptation are urgently needed in Asia and Africa to aid socioeconomic systems suffering from heat extremes due to climate change. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Future reversal of warming-enhanced vegetation productivity in the Northern Hemisphere

Yichen Zhang,Shilong Piao,Yan Sun,Brendan M. Rogers,Xiangyi Li,Xu Lian,Zhihua Liu,Anping Chen,Josep Peñuelas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01374-w

IF: 30.7

2022-05-31

Nature Climate Change

Abstract:Climatic warming has greatly increased vegetation productivity in the extratropical Northern Hemisphere since the 1980s, but how long this positive relationship will continue remains unknown. Here we show changes in the effect of warming on Northern Hemisphere summer gross primary productivity for 2001–2100 using Earth system model outputs. The correlation between summer gross primary productivity and temperature decreases in temperate and boreal regions by the late twenty-first century, generally becoming significantly negative before 2070 in regions <60° N, though Arctic gross primary productivity continues to increase with further summer warming. The time when the correlation becomes negative is generally later than the time when summer temperature exceeds the optimal temperature for vegetation productivity, suggesting partial mitigation of the negative vegetation impacts of future warming with photosynthetic thermal acclimation. Our findings indicate that vegetation productivity could be impaired by climate change in the twenty-first century, which could negatively impact the global land carbon sink.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,meteorology & atmospheric sciences
A meta-analysis of the total economic impact of climate change

Richard S.J. Tol

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.12199

2022-08-27

Abstract:Earlier meta-analyses of the economic impact of climate change are updated with more data, with three new results: (1) The central estimate of the economic impact of global warming is always negative. (2) The confidence interval about the estimates is much wider. (3) Elicitation methods are most pessimistic, econometric studies most optimistic. Two previous results remain: (4) The uncertainty about the impact is skewed towards negative surprises. (5) Poorer countries are much more vulnerable than richer ones. A meta-analysis of the impact of weather shocks reveals that studies, which relate economic growth to temperature levels, cannot agree on the sign of the impact whereas studies, which make economic growth a function of temperature change do agree on the sign but differ an order of magnitude in effect size. The former studies posit that climate change has a permanent effect on economic growth, the latter that the effect is transient. The impact on economic growth implied by studies of the impact of climate change is close to the growth impact estimated as a function of weather shocks. The social cost of carbon shows a similar pattern to the total impact estimates, but with more emphasis on the impacts of moderate warming in the near and medium term.

General Economics

Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production

The effects of weather conditions on economic growth: Evidence from global subnational economic output and income

The Change of Global Temperature Affected by Global Economy

China Feels the Heat: Negative Impacts of High Temperatures on China's Rice Sector

Day-to-day temperature variability reduces economic growth

Is temperature adversely related to economic development? Evidence on the short-run and the long-run links from sub-national data

The Economic Geography of Global Warming

The impact of temperature on labor productivity——evidence from temperature-sensitive enterprises

The Effects of Temperature on Labor Productivity

Contrasting influences of biogeophysical and biogeochemical impacts of historical land use on global economic inequality

Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to U.S. crop yields under climate change

Climate change and economic prosperity: Evidence from a flexible damage function

Climate Warming Effects on Income Polarization in China

Long-term Effects of Temperature Variations on Economic Growth: A Machine Learning Approach

Valuing the Global Mortality Consequences of Climate Change Accounting for Adaptation Costs and Benefits

New damage curves and multimodel analysis suggest lower optimal temperature

The nonlinear relationship between temperature changes and economic development for individual provinces in China

The Uneven Impacts of Climate Change on China's Labor Productivity and Economy

Global socioeconomic exposure of heat extremes under climate change

Future reversal of warming-enhanced vegetation productivity in the Northern Hemisphere

A meta-analysis of the total economic impact of climate change