Abstract:In countries with a high degree of equity concentration, such as China, the second type of agency problem is serious in which major shareholders of listed companies encroach on the interests of small and medium shareholders through private placement. As a financial transaction system, the short-selling mechanism has the function of external corporate governance. Therefore, this paper examines the impact of relaxing short-selling controls on companies’ private placements. Based on the quasi-natural experiment of China’s gradual relaxation of short-selling controls since 2010, a double-difference model (DID) test is constructed to find that relaxing short-selling controls reduces companies’ private placement tendency and amount, and this effect is mainly reflected in samples with a higher degree of equity checks and balances. Further analysis found that when the size of the company’s financing constraints is different, the impact of relaxing short-selling control on the company’s private placement tendency and amount is different; when the chairman and the general manager have two positions, relaxing short-selling control reduces the company’s private placement options, but it has a negative impact on the company’s private placement. There is no difference in the impact of the company’s private placement amount. It can be excluded that the relaxation of short-selling control suppresses the company’s placement through financing constraints and corporate governance mechanisms. Compared to a good information environment, when the company’s information environment is poor, relaxing short-selling controls reduces the company’s private placement tendency and amount. Significantly, it shows that the relaxation of short-selling control policy and supervision inhibits the company’s private placement through the information environment mechanism, and promotes the sustainable development of enterprises. It not only improves the literature in the field of short-selling mechanism affecting corporate behavior, but it also enriches the research on the transfer of benefits of private placement of companies.

Corporate governance and private placement issuance in Australia

An analysis on the effect of private placement by Chinese listed companies

Notice of Retraction An analysis on the effect of private placement by Chinese listed companies

Corporate Philanthropy and Tunneling: Evidence from China

Public Governance and Tunneling: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment in China

The Inhibitory Effect of the Deregulation Short-Sale on Private Equity Placement

The Role of Existing Shareholders in Private Equity Placements in China

A Review on the Private Placements of Public Companies

Private placement and abnormal corporate payouts: evidence from large stock dividends

Listed Company Mergers and Acquisitions, Private Placement and Earnings Management

Corporate payout policy: does product market competition matter? Evidence from Australia

Corporate reputation, shareholders’ gains, and market discounts: evidence from the private equity placement in China

IPO pricing deregulation and corporate governance: Theory and evidence from Chinese public firms

A re-examination of China’s share issue privatization

Does the Provision of Voluntary Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Influence the Cost of Equity Capital? Evidence from Australia and the United Kingdom

Competing for private investments in public equity in China: The role of corporate philanthropy

Board independence and PIPE offerings

MOTIVATION AND CHARACTERS ANALYSIS OF CONTROLLING SHAREHOLDERS IN PRIVATE PLACEMENT

Internal corporate governance and the use of IPO over-financing: Evidence from China

Corporate Governance and Capital Structure Decisions: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Does Firms’ Equity Financing Benefit Debtholders? Evidence from Private Placements of Equity