Abstract:It has been proposed that animals and humans might choose a speed-accuracy tradeoff that maximizes reward rate. For this utility function the simple drift-diffusion model of two-alternative forced-choice tasks predicts a parameter-free optimal performance curve that relates normalized decision times to error rates under varying task conditions. However, behavioral data indicate that only ≈ 30% of subjects achieve optimality, and here we investigate the possibility that, in allowing for uncertainties, subjects might exercise robust strategies instead of optimal ones. We consider two strategies in which robustness is achieved by relinquishing performance: maximin and robust-satisficing. The former supposes maximization of guaranteed performance under a presumed level of uncertainty; the latter assumes that subjects require a critical performance level and maximize the level of uncertainty under which it can be guaranteed. These strategies respectively yield performance curves parameterized by presumed uncertainty level and required performance. Maximin performance curves for uncertainties in response-to-stimulus interval match data for the lower-scoring 70% of subjects well, and are more likely to explain it than robust-satisficing or alternative optimal performance curves that emphasize accuracy. For uncertainties in signal-to-noise ratio, neither maximin nor robust-satisficing performance curves adequately describe the data. We discuss implications for decisions under uncertainties, and suggest further behavioral assays.

Robust Satisficing via Regret Minimization

Tough enough? Robust satisficing as a decision norm for long-term policy analysis

Robust satisficing and the probability of survival

Satisficing as an alternative to optimality and suboptimality in perceptual decision making

Statistical Properties of Robust Satisficing

Optimization with Reference-Based Robust Preference Constraints

Robust versus optimal strategies for two-alternative forced choice tasks

Regret and Behavior: Comment on Zeelenberg and Pieters

The Maximizing Mind-Set

Maximin Safety: When Failing to Lose is Preferable to Trying to Win

Robust-satisficing ethics in intelligence

Good enough—compromise between desirability and feasibility: An alternative perspective on satisficing

Minimizing Maximum Regret in Commitment Constrained Sequential Decision Making

Robust decision-making under risk and ambiguity

Reining in regret: emotion regulation modulates regret in decision making

Learning Optimal Advantage from Preferences and Mistaking it for Reward

Decision structure of risky choice

On Admissible Strategies in Robust Utility Maximization

The Best of Many Robustness Criteria in Decision Making: Formulation and Application to Robust Pricing

Robust Losses for Decision-Focused Learning

Decision-making under risk: when is utility maximization equivalent to risk minimization?