How Federal Reserve Discussions Respond to Increased Transparency

Michael Egesdal,Michael Gill,Martin Rotemberg
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2676429
2015-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:We analyze how the behavior of the Federal Open Market Committee changed after the statutory enforcement of transparency laws in 1993. To do this, we develop techniques to describe how language use changes over time. For a set of widely used vector space metrics, we demonstrate how to decompose aggregate changes into each individual dimension's contribution (such as a particular word's influence). Our approach can be generalized to account for associations between document dimensions (such as word definitions or meanings). Using various documents released by the Federal Reserve from 1976-2007, covering both years in which the FOMC knew its deliberations would eventually be made public, and years in which it believed no records were kept, we find that FOMC deliberations became more similar to the always-public press releases in the transparency regime. FOMC members shifted their comments towards popular economic subjects, such as "inflation" and "growth," and away from personal opinions, like "think." In this setting, the observed changes are not purely substitution across words with the same meaning, as the results are robust to accounting for semantic relations.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?