Abstract:Various lines of defense against infection are present in all living creatures. The balance between symbiosis and parasitism is determined by the mechanisms through which the host resists infection and by the extent of injury induced by the parasite: both factors contribute to disease. Lines of host defense can be arbitrarily divided into three components: 1) barrier functions of skin and mucous membranes and their innate physical and secretory antimicrobial components; 2) elements of host defense that do not necessarily require prior exposure to an infectious agent or immunologic memory (mast cells, granulocytes, macrophages, NK cells, gamma/delta T cells); and 3) immune responses directed against specific epitopes on the infectious agent induced by prior exposure and immunologic memory (alpha/beta T cells, B cells). Analysis of such host defense mechanisms repeatedly documents tremendous redundancy and overlap between these lines of defense. Further, there is open communication, so that a change at any one level ripples throughout the system. Acquired nonspecific resistance to infection is an example of such a ripple. Host response to one infection alerts the immune system, so that the general level of resistance to other infectious agents is increased. This response is initiated by an immune response (third line of defense) but effected by nonspecific elements (second line of defense). The survival value of such responses is obvious. There are numerous examples in both mouse and man of the operation of these systems in response to infection. Further, the menus of antimicrobial components available to both mouse and man for resistance to infection are very similar, but not identical. Indeed, it is said that the genetic basis for differences between mice and man revolve around a difference of less than 10% in DNA sequences. But there are differences! Mouse macrophages produce IFN-beta in response to infection, human cells produce IFN-alpha. Mouse macrophages effect antimicrobial activity principally through induction of NO synthase and the generation of toxic nitrogen oxides. This pathway has yet to be described with human macrophages. In both man and mouse, F. tularensis is an obligate intracellular parasite of macrophages that requires an essential component provided by the cell for its replication. That mouse and man are not so different is well illustrated by the effector mechanisms induced by IFN-gamma for antimicrobial activity against F. tularensis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The Isolation and Characterization of Murine Macrophages

Bone marrow-derived macrophage production.

Isolation and Characterization of Ovine Monocyte-Derived Macrophages from Peripheral Blood.

Macrophages: sentinels and regulators of the immune system

Macrophage variants in laboratory research: most are well done, but some are RAW

Intestinal monocytes and macrophages are required for T cell polarization in response to Citrobacter rodentium

Immunobiology of the Macrophage

Progress in Alveolar Macrophages

Macrophages in Immunoregulation and Therapeutics

Macrophage activation differentially modulates particle binding, phagocytosis and downstream antimicrobial mechanisms

Macrophage Cytokines: Involvement in Immunity and Infectious Diseases

Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation

Macrophage fate: to kill or not to kill?

The macrophage: Past, present and future

Innate immunity champions: The diverse functions of macrophages

Macrophage activation: a riddle of immunological resistance

In-Depth Characterization of Monocyte-Derived Macrophages using a Mass Cytometry-Based Phagocytosis Assay

Resident and elicited murine macrophages differ in expression of their glycomes and glycan-binding proteins

Function of Macrophages in Disease: Current Understanding on Molecular Mechanisms

Macrophages and the Extracellular Matrix

Two distinct interstitial macrophage populations coexist across tissues in specific subtissular niches