Abstract:Background: Similar effect sizes have been reported for the effects of conspiracy, pseudoscientific, and paranormal beliefs on authoritarian attitudes, which points to a conceptual problem at the heart of the conspiracy literature, namely lack of clarity as to what uniquely defines conspiracy beliefs and whether those unique elements contribute distinctly to authoritarian ideologies. To our knowledge, this is the first study to test empirically the predictive power of variance unique to each construct against covariance shared among these constructs when predicting authoritarian and anti-democratic attitudes. Methods: Online survey was administered to 314 participants in 2021 that included a battery of demographic and psychological measures. Hierarchical factor models were used to isolate unique variance from shared covariance among responses to items representing conspiracy, paranormal and pseudoscientific beliefs. Structural equation models were used to test their unique and shared effects on authoritarian and anti-democratic attitudes. Results: We found that our combined measurement model of paranormal thinking, conspiracism, and pseudoscience exhibited exceptional model fit, and that each construct was strongly predictive of both SDO and RWA (r = 0.73-0.86). Once the shared covariance was partitioned into a higher order factor, the residual uniqueness in each first order factors was either negatively related or unrelated to authoritarian and anti-democratic attitudes. Moreover, the higher order factor explained the gross majority of variance in conspiracy (R2 = 0.81) paranormal (R2 = 0.81) and pseudoscientific (R2 = 0.95) beliefs and was a far stronger predictor (β = 0.85, p < 0.01) of anti-democratic attitudes than political partisanship (β = 0.17, p < 0.01). Strong partisan identifiers of both parties showed much higher romanticism scores than party moderates. Conclusion and limitations: When predicting authoritarian and anti-democratic attitudes, we found no empirically unique contributions of conspiracy beliefs. Instead, we found that a shared factor, representing a 'romantic' mindset was the main predictor of authoritarian and anti-democratic attitudes. This finding potentially explains failures of interventions in stopping the spread of misinformation and conspiracy theories. Conspiracy theory researchers should refocus on the shared features that conspiracy thinking has with other unwarranted epistemic beliefs to better understand how to halt the spread of misinformation, conspiracy thinking, anti-science attitudes, and even global authoritarianism.

Does Self-Love or Self-Hate Predict Conspiracy Beliefs? Narcissism, Self-Esteem, and the Endorsement of Conspiracy Theories

Conspiracy blaming in the aftermath of group relative deprivation: The moderating role of national narcissism

Their own worst enemy? Collective narcissists are willing to conspire against their in-group

The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories

Low self-esteem predicts out-group derogation via collective narcissism, but this relationship is obscured by in-group satisfaction.

National Narcissism predicts the Belief in and the Dissemination of Conspiracy Theories During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence From 56 Countries

When the sun goes down: low political knowledge and high national narcissism predict climate change conspiracy beliefs

Conspiracy Beliefs and the Perception of Intergroup Inequalities

When do conspiracy theories shape behavioural intentions? The moderating role of the need to evaluate

Do you have to be mad to believe in conspiracy theories? Personality disorders and conspiracy theories

Conspiracy Mentality: How it Relates to Populism, Relative Deprivation, Mistrust of Expertise and Voting Behaviour

Conspiracy thinking and the long historical shadow of Romanticism on authoritarian politics

A vicious circle? Longitudinal relationships between different modes of in-group identity and COVID-19 conspiracy thinking

"Trust me, do not trust anyone": how epistemic mistrust and credulity are associated with conspiracy mentality

Relationships between Dark Tetrad traits and beliefs in conspiracy theories: Mediation effects of cognitive styles

Unmasking Narcissus: A competitive test of existing hypotheses on (agentic, antagonistic, neurotic, and communal) narcissism and (explicit and implicit) self-esteem across 18 samples

The Relationship Between Social Media Use and Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation

The conspiratorial mind: A meta-analytic review of motivational and personological correlates.

Thought contagion? Conspiracy beliefs boost paranoid thoughts

Why Education Predicts Decreased Belief in Conspiracy Theories

“If they believe, then so shall I”: Perceived beliefs of the in-group predict conspiracy theory belief