Abstract:Underlying research tries to assess the impact of the credit rating monitoring on the working capital management and thus the impact on the overall profitability of the non-financial FTSE 100 firms. We used Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), and Tobin Q as the profıtabiliy proxies. The first two measures represent the accounting firm's performance, while the latter is used as market profitability. The Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC) was used in this study to proxy working capital like many others in the preceding literature. Our findings suggest that aggressive working capital management is still the key to corporate profitability for non-financial FTSE100 firms when ROE is used. However, it supports the conservative working capital policy when Tobin Q is employed as a profitability measure. Nevertheless, when credit rating agency monitoring is in place, we can disclose a different story. Findings from this study using the System GMM methodology outline that when credit rating agencies' credit rating monitoring is in place, firms tend to spread the time for CCC. Relative to the previous statement, the firms that are not monitored are likely to shorten the CCC for attaining a higher profit level for the accounting measures of ROA and ROE. Nevertheless, we could not be able to find similar results with the Random effect (RE) models. We believe that the endogenous nature of the variables used in this study could trigger the insignificant impact of credit rating monitoring while using the RE models.Underlying research tries to assess the impact of the credit rating monitoring on the working capital management and thus the impact on the overall profitability of the non-financial FTSE 100 firms. We used Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), and Tobin Q as the profıtabiliy proxies. The first two measures represent the accounting firm's performance, while the latter is used as market profitability. The Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC) was used in this study to proxy working capital like many others in the preceding literature. Our findings suggest that aggressive working capital management is still the key to corporate profitability for non-financial FTSE100 firms when ROE is used. However, it supports the conservative working capital policy when Tobin Q is employed as a profitability measure. Nevertheless, when credit rating agency monitoring is in place, we can disclose a different story. Findings from this study using the System GMM methodology outline that when credit rating agencies' credit rating monitoring is in place, firms tend to spread the time for CCC. Relative to the previous statement, the firms that are not monitored are likely to shorten the CCC for attaining a higher profit level for the accounting measures of ROA and ROE. Nevertheless, we could not be able to find similar results with the Random effect (RE) models. We believe that the endogenous nature of the variables used in this study could trigger the insignificant impact of credit rating monitoring while using the RE models.

Working capital management, board structure and Tobin's q ratio of Thai listed firms

Does board composition influence working capital management? Evidence from Thailand

Board structure and net working capital: evidence from FTSE all share index companies

Threshold effect of working capital management on firm profitability: evidence from Vietnam

Working Capital Management And Firm Performance In China

Working Capital Management Aggressiveness and Its Performance: Evidence from Agro-Food Industry in Thailand

Does management of working capital enhance firm value? Empirical analysis of manufacturing enterprises in India

Impact of working capital management on profitability: evidence from listed companies in Qatar

Female directors and working capital management: aggressive vs. conservative strategy

THE WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT ON THE CORPORATE PROFITABILITY OF LISTED FIRMS: EVIDENCE FROM CREDIT RATINGS ON FTSE 100 COMPANIES

Does Working Capital Management Influence Operating and Market Risk of Firms?

The Impact of Working Capital Management on the performance of Listed Firms: Evidence of an Emerging Economy

Working Capital Management and Performance of Telecommunication Companies in ASEAN-4: The Role of Financial Development

Working capital management and AIM listed SME companies profitability: a mixed research method approach.

Working Capital Management and Corporate Profitability: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam

Working capital management and firm performance: A comparative analysis of developed and emerging economies

An Empirical Investigation of Linkage between Working Capital Management and Profitability: Panel Data Evidence from Bangladesh Pharmaceutical Industry

The Interplay between Working Capital Management and a Firm’s Financial Performance across the Corporate Life Cycle

Internal corporate governance mechanisms and firm performance: 3SLS empirical evidence from Thailand

Working capital management, the market environment and corporate performance: evidence from China

Working capital management and financial performance of UK listed firms: a contingency approach