Abstract:In many countries, including the UK, the potential of international student achievement surveys such as TIMSS and PISA is being subverted by political and media fixation on the resulting league tables. These prompt not just well-founded efforts to learn from others’ success but also ill-founded assertions about educational cause and effect, inappropriate transplanting of the policies to which success is attributed, and even the reconfiguring of entire national curricula to respond less to national culture, values and needs than to the dubious claims of ‘international benchmarking’ and ‘world class’ educational standards – the latter equated with test scores in a limited spectrum of human learning. Informing such responses are the attractively simple nostrums of high profile and highly selective literature reviews that massage policymakers’ urge for the quick fix by playing down the complex interplay of culture and schooling and ignoring the kinds of evidence that can provide a truer and more nuanced picture of education systems in action. Using a typology developed by the US National Research Council, the paper critiques three recent and influential examples of this paradigm before illustrating an alternative approach. This draws on the author’s comparative studies of culture and pedagogy to show how explicating the principles that underpin observed classroom practice, rather than copying national policies, can lead to genuine transformation of the quality and outcomes of student learning. The paper ends by contending that PISA panic and the supremacist mindset it feeds have dangerously distorted the debate about what a ‘world class’ education should entail. With PISA 2012 now in progress, policymakers are urged to redress the balance.

Commercialising comparison: Pearson puts the TLC in soft capitalism

Fixing contradictions of education commercialisation: Pearson plc and the construction of its efficacy brand

Making markets through digital platforms: Pearson, edu-business, and the (e)valuation of higher education

Marketising private tuition: Representations of tutors’ competence, entrepreneurial opportunities and service legitimation in home tutoring business manuals

The OECD and IELS: Redefining early childhood education for the 21st century

Moral Panic, Miracle Cures and Educational Policy: what can we really learn from international comparison?

Governing schooling through ‘what works’: the OECD’s PISA for Schools

Providing a platform for ‘what works’: platform-based governance and the reshaping of teacher learning through the OECD’s PISA4U

The complicity of digital technologies in the marketisation of UK higher education: exploring the implications of a critical discourse analysis of thirteen national digital teaching and learning strategies

The marketization of education

E-Learning for the Public Good? The Policy Trajectory of Online Education in Ontario, Canada

Consumerisation in UK higher education business schools: higher fees, greater stress and debatable outcomes

Global citizenship education practices in Singapore and Australia: Tensions between educational and market rationales

Policy borrowing, policy learning: testing times in Australian schooling

Buying, selling and outsourcing educational reform: the Global Education Industry and ‘policy borrowing’ in the Gulf

From national policy-making to global edu-business: Swedish edu-preneurs on the move

Managing the student experience in English higher education: Differing responses to market pressures

Packaging the primary curriculum: textbooks and the English National Curriculum

Comparative education in an age of competition and collaboration

Marketized private tutoring as a supplement to regular schooling: Liberal Studies and the shadow sector in Hong Kong secondary education

Edu-business within the Triple Helix. Value production through assetization of educational research