[Cochlear implantation and early outcomes in children with incompletely partition type Ⅲ malformation]
L Xu,X H Chao,D F Wu,J F Luo,Z M Fan,H B Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2018.16.007
Abstract:Objective:To analyze the early effect of the cochlear implantation (CI) in children with cochlear incompletely partition type Ⅲ malformation (IP-Ⅲ). Method:Ten children with IP-Ⅲ malformation who underwent CI were recruited in this study. The hearing characteristics, preoperative speech performance and surgery were analyzed retrospectively. The aided hearing threshold with CI, the categories of auditory performance (CAP) score, speech intelligibility rating (SIR) score and speech perception were designed to access the benefits of CI. Ten children with normal cochlea were also enrolled as the control group. Demographic information of children in the control group including hearing loss and speech level before implantation, age at implantation, hearing aids using history, duration with CI were matched with those in the IP-Ⅲ group. The hearing threshold, CAP score and SIR score in the IP-Ⅲ group were compared with the control group using the SPSS 20.0 software. Result:The computed tomography of temporal bones showed typical IP-Ⅲ malformation in all patients. The electrode arrays were properly and totally implanted in all children. Cerebrospinal fluid gusher occurred intra-operatively, and no other complications in all patients. The pure tone average (PTA) threshold at the 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th month after implantation were (40.8±8.5) dB HL, (36.1±9.1) dB HL, (32.5±6.8) dB HL and (33.0±7.3) dB HL, respectively. The PTA thresholds in the IP-Ⅲ group were similar to those in the control group at all tested time points (P>0.05). At the 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th month after implantation, the CAP scores in the IP-Ⅲ group were lower than those in the control group, but there was no significantly difference (P>0.05). Furthermore, the SIR scores were lower than those in the control group, and there were significantly difference at the 6 th, 9 th and 12 th month after implantation (P<0.05). Conclusion:CI was an effective treatment for children with IP-Ⅲ malformation. Surgery on IP-Ⅲ was challenging, however, seldom complication would occur with excellent surgical skills. Though the CI was benefit for IP-Ⅲ, the development of hearing and speech ability were slower than children with normal cochlea.