Abstract:Linguistic norms emerge in human communities because people imitate each other. A shared linguistic system provides people with the benefits of shared knowledge and coordinated planning. Once norms are in place, why would they ever change? This question, echoing broad questions in the theory of social dynamics, has particular force in relation to language. By definition, an innovator is in the minority when the innovation first occurs. In some areas of social dynamics, important minorities can strongly influence the majority through their power, fame, or use of broadcast media. But most linguistic changes are grassroots developments that originate with ordinary people. Here, we develop a novel model of communicative behavior in communities, and identify a mechanism for arbitrary innovations by ordinary people to have a good chance of being widely adopted. To imitate each other, people must form a mental representation of what other people do. Each time they speak, they must also decide which form to produce themselves. We introduce a new decision function that enables us to smoothly explore the space between two types of behavior: probability matching (matching the probabilities of incoming experience) and regularization (producing some forms disproportionately often). Using Monte Carlo methods, we explore the interactions amongst the degree of regularization, the distribution of biases in a network, and the network position of the innovator. We identify two regimes for the widespread adoption of arbritrary innovations, viewed as informational cascades in the network. With moderate regularization of experienced input, average people (not well-connected people) are the most likely source of successful innovations. Our results shed light on a major outstanding puzzle in the theory of language change. The framework also holds promise for understanding the dynamics of other social norms.

A blueprint of the Entrenchment-and- Conventionalization Model

A model of grassroots changes in linguistic systems

Conventionalization of Linguistic Knowledge under Communicative Constraints

How individuals change language

On an Interaction Model of General Language Change

The Dynamics of Norm Change in the Cultural Evolution of Language

Introduction to the special issue: parsimony and redundancy in models of language

Language change in a multiple group society

Constructing a Consensus on Language Evolution? Convergences and Differences Between Biolinguistic and Usage-Based Approaches

Conventionalization Of Linguistic Categories Under Simple Communicative Constraints

From partners to populations: A hierarchical Bayesian account of coordination and convention

Norm Participation Grounds Language

Decentralised Emergence of Robust and Adaptive Linguistic Conventions in Populations of Autonomous Agents Grounded in Continuous Worlds

The Dynamics of Social Conventions in LLM populations: Spontaneous Emergence, Collective Biases and Tipping Points

The Molonglo Southern 4 Jy sample (MS4). I. Definition

Structural Priming Demonstrates Abstract Grammatical Representations in Multilingual Language Models

Should Intercultural Communication Change the Way We Think About Language?

Conventionality in family conversations about everyday objects

Modelling Social Structures and Hierarchies in Language Evolution

Finding Structure in Language Models

Collective patterns and stable misunderstandings in networks striving for consensus without a common value system