Abstract:Abstract Cotranslational folding is expected to occur when the folding speed of the nascent chain is faster than the translation speed of the ribosome, but it is difficult to predict which proteins cotranslationally fold. Here, we simulate evolution of model proteins to investigate how native structure influences evolution of cotranslational folding. We developed a model that connects protein folding during and after translation to cellular fitness. Model proteins evolved improved folding speed and stability, with proteins adopting one of two strategies for folding quickly. Low contact order proteins evolve to fold cotranslationally. Such proteins adopt native conformations early on during the translation process, with each subsequently translated residue establishing additional native contacts. On the other hand, high contact order proteins tend not to be stable in their native conformations until the full chain is nearly extruded. We also simulated evolution of slowly translating codons, finding that slowing translation at certain positions enhances cotranslational folding. Finally, we investigated real protein structures using a previously published dataset that identified evolutionarily conserved rare codons in E. coli genes and associated such codons with cotranslational folding intermediates. We found that protein substructures preceding conserved rare codons tend to have lower contact orders, in line with our finding that lower contact order proteins are more likely to fold cotranslationally. Our work shows how evolutionary selection pressure can cause proteins with local contact topologies to evolve cotranslational folding. Statement of significance Substantial evidence exists for proteins folding as they are translated by the ribosome. Here we developed a biologically intuitive evolutionary model to show that avoiding premature protein degradation can be a sufficient evolutionary force to drive evolution of cotranslational folding. Furthermore, we find that whether a protein’s native fold consists of more local or more nonlocal contacts affects whether cotranslational folding evolves. Proteins with local contact topologies are more likely to evolve cotranslational folding through nonsynonymous mutations that strengthen native contacts as well as through synonymous mutations that provide sufficient time for cotranslational folding intermediates to form.

Cotranslational protein folding on the ribosome monitored in real time

Single Molecule Structural Dynamics of Ribosome Before and During Translocation

The human ribosome modulates multidomain protein biogenesis by delaying cotranslational domain docking

Co-Translational Folding of Multi-Domain Proteins

Protein folding. Translational tuning optimizes nascent protein folding in cells

Resolving chaperone-assisted protein folding on the ribosome at the peptide level

Translation‐coupled protein folding assay using a protease to monitor the folding status

Monitoring Protein Conformation along the Pathway of Chaperonin-Assisted Folding

Effects of protein size, thermodynamic stability, and net charge on cotranslational folding on the ribosome

Translational Control by Ribosome Pausing in Bacteria: How a Non-uniform Pace of Translation Affects Protein Production and Folding

A dynamic intermediate state limits the folding rate of a discontinuous two-domain protein

Concerted Action of the Ribosome and the Associated Chaperone Trigger Factor Confines Nascent Polypeptide Folding

Folding At The Birth Of The Nascent Chain: Coordinating Translation With Co-Translational Folding

Folding of Newly Translated Proteins In Vivo: The Role of Molecular Chaperones

Effect of protein structure on evolution of cotranslational folding

Watching proteins fold one molecule at a time

Analyzing the implications of protein folding delay caused by translation

Visualization of translation and protein biogenesis at the ER membrane

Cotranslational Biogenesis of Membrane Proteins in Bacteria

GroEL/ES chaperonin unfolds then encapsulates a nascent protein on the ribosome