Comparison of total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis in patients with haemophilia using gait analysis: two case reports

Marc Dauty,Raphael Gross,Fabien Leboeuf,Marc Trossaert
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1763-y
2015-12-01
BMC Research Notes
Abstract:BackgroundSevere hemophilia is an inherited, lifelong bleeding disorder characterized by spontaneous bleeding, which results in painful joint deformities. Currently two surgical treatments are available to treat haemophilia-related ankle joint destruction: ankle arthrodesis and total ankle replacement. The aim of the present study was to compare these two surgical procedures in haemophiliac subjects.Case presentationKinematic and dynamic parameters were quantified using a three-dimensional gait-analysis system in two similar clinical cases. In Caucasian case 1, ankle arthrodesis was chosen because of a kinematic ankle flexion defect and lack of dynamic power regeneration. The defect in energy absorption was compensated for by the contralateral side. Total ankle replacement in Caucasian case 2 allowed sparing the ipsilateral knee (maximum 0.27 preoperatively vs. 0.71 W/kg postoperatively) and hip joints powers (maximum 0.43 preoperatively vs. 1.25 W/kg postoperatively) because of the small ankle dorsiflexion motion.ConclusionsTotal ankle replacement is recommended for haemophiliac patients who present with a preserved ankle range of motion.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?