Abstract:This article examines the production of China’s “ghost cities” and constant urban expansion to challenge the dominant conceptual narrative of rural-to-urban migration as the driver of urbanisation. It argues that behind China’s “miraculous” urbanisation story is a powerful ideological commitment to urban growth as the “royal road” to modernity and assessment of political performance. Local governments have a wide-ranging “tool-kit” for pursuing urbanisation, ranging from administrative border-drawing to expropriation of rural land and investment in expanding urban infrastructures. Urbanisation is the destination to which all paths seem to lead. Indeed, local states pursue the construction of new urban space, even when doing so harms them financially. But why? The concept of phantom urbanisation names the process whereby constructing the aesthetic form of the urban is even more important to local state actors than economic, demographic or environmental repercussions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to explore and explain the "ghost city" phenomenon in China and the "phantom urbanization" process behind it. Specifically, the authors Christian Sorace and William Hurst challenge the mainstream narrative about China's urbanization, that is, rural - to - urban migration is the main driving force for urbanization. They believe that behind China's "miraculous" urbanization story is a strong ideological commitment to urban growth, which is regarded as the "royal road" to modernization and also a criterion for evaluating political performance. Local governments have a series of tools to pursue urbanization, including administrative boundary demarcation, requisition of rural land and investment in expanding urban infrastructure, etc. Even if these practices are economically disadvantageous to local governments, they are still actively promoted.
The core question of the paper is: Why, in the process of China's urbanization, is building the appearance of the city more important than economic, demographic or environmental impacts? The authors put forward the concept of "phantom urbanization" to describe this process of achieving urbanization by building the appearance of the city rather than the substance. This kind of urbanization has led to the emergence of a large number of "ghost cities", that is, those newly - built urban areas that have the form of a city but lack actual residents and economic activities.
The paper also analyzes several specific manifestations in China's urbanization:
1. **Administrative urbanization**: By changing and upgrading the local administrative status, such as changing a town into a city, a county into a city, etc., to increase the proportion of urbanization statistically, while actually not improving the local living conditions.
2. **Construction of urban appearance**: Building facades that look like a city, but lacking basic infrastructure and economic needs, and even without people living there.
3. **Copying famous cities**: Building some projects that imitate famous cities, such as Mini - Paris, Mini - Manhattan, etc., but they often end up as "ghost cities" in the end.
4. **Construction of ecological cities**: For example, the Tianjin Eco - City in the Sino - Singapore cooperation, but these projects also often become "ghost cities" due to the lack of actual residents.
In addition, the paper also discusses the social and economic problems arising in the process of urbanization, such as high housing prices, high housing vacancy rates, and insufficient infrastructure. The authors point out that this urbanization model not only wastes a large amount of resources, but also leads to many social problems, such as the widening gap between urban and rural areas and the destruction of the ecological environment.
Overall, this paper aims to reveal the deep - seated problems in the process of China's urbanization and put forward the concept of "phantom urbanization" to explain these phenomena.