Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to estimate the effectiveness of the credit evaluation system using the borrowing data from China’s leading P2P lending platform, Renrendai.com. Design/methodology/approach The current credit valuation systems are classified into the forward-looking mechanism, which judges the borrowers’ credit levels based on their uploaded information, and the backward-looking mechanism, which judges the borrowers’ credit levels based on their historical repayment performance. Probit models and Tobit models are used to examine the effectiveness of credit evaluation mechanisms. Findings The results show that only the “hard” information reflecting borrowers’ credit ability can explain the default risk on the platform under the forward-looking credit evaluation mechanism. The backward-looking credit evaluation mechanism (BCEM) based on the repeated borrowings produces both promise-enhancing and “fishing” incentives and thus fails to explain the default risk, and weakens the effectiveness of forward-looking credit indicators in explaining the default risk because it encourages borrowers to invest in forging forward-looking credit indicators. Additional information such as the interest rate and the repayment periods reveals borrowers’ credit and thus can also be used as a predictor of borrowers’ default risk. Practical implications The findings suggest that current ex ante screening based on the information collected from the borrowers or repeated borrowings is inadequate to control the default risk in P2P lending markets and thus needs be improved. Ex post monitoring and sharing on defaulter’s information should be strengthened to increase the default cost and thus to deter potential bad borrowers. Originality/value To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first paper classifying the credit evaluation system in online P2P lending market into the forward-looking type and the backward-looking type, which is important since they provide different incentives to borrowers. The paper also investigates and provides evidence on the promise-enhancing and “fishing” incentives of BCEMs.

Measuring bank risk: Forward-looking z-score

An alternative Z-score measure for downside bank insolvency risk

On the Consistency of the Z-Score to Measure the Bank Risk

Supervisory bank risk early warning modeling: an examiner’s first line of defense

Bank insolvency risk and Z-score measures: A refinement

Risk Shocks and Corporate Policies: A Text-Based Analysis

Risk Measures: Robustness, Elicitability, and Backtesting.

Elicitability and backtesting: Perspectives for banking regulation

Forward Looking Vs Backward Looking

Predicting Corporate Policies Using Downside Risk: A Machine Learning Approach

Twenty‐five years of the Taffler z‐score model: Does it really have predictive ability?

Measuring credit risk using qualitative disclosure

Using the Z-Score to Analyze the Financial Soundness of Insurance Firms

Measuring Financial Distress and Predicting Corporate Bankruptcy: An Index Approach

Bankruptcy Risk Prediction Using Altman’s Z-Score Model: An Empirical Study on Private Commercial Banks of Bangladesh

Do Firm-Level Factors Play Forward-Looking Role for Financial Systemic Risk: Evidence from China

Do Changes in Risk Perception Predict Systemic Banking Crises?

Introducing the overall risk scoring as an early warning system

A New Methodology for Estimating Internal Credit Risk and Bankruptcy Prediction under Basel II Regime

Assessing machine learning for forecasting economic risk: Evidence from an expanded Chinese financial information set

Forecasting Bank Default Risk with Interpretable Machine Learning: The Study of Chinese Banks