Abstract:The Darwin–Bateman paradigm predicts that females enhance their fitness by being choosy and mating with high‐quality males, while males should compete to mate with as many females as possible. In many species, males enhance their fitness by defending females and/or resources used by females. That is, males directly defend access to mating opportunities. However, paternity analyses have repeatedly shown that females in most species mate polyandrously, which contradicts traditional expectations that male defensive behaviours lead to monandry. Here, in an extensive meta‐analysis, encompassing 109 species and 1026 effect sizes from across the animal kingdom, we tested if the occurrence of defensive behaviours modulates sexual selection on females and males. If so, we can illuminate the extent to which males really succeed in defending access to mating and fertilisation opportunities. We used four different indices of the opportunity for sexual selection that comprise pre‐mating and/or post‐mating episodes of selection. We found, for both sexes, that the occurrence of defensive behaviours does not modulate the potential strength of sexual selection. This implies that male defensive behaviours do not predict the true intensity of sexual selection. While the most extreme levels of sexual selection on males are in species with male defensive behaviours, which indicates that males do sometimes succeed in restricting females' re‐mating ability (e.g. elephant seals, Mirounga leonina), estimates of the opportunity for sexual selection vary greatly across species, regardless of whether or not defensive behaviours occur. Indeed, widespread polyandry shows that females are usually not restricted by male defensive behaviours. In addition, our results indicate that post‐mating episodes of selection, such as cryptic female choice and sperm competition, might be important factors modulating the opportunity for sexual selection. We discuss: (i) why male defensive behaviours fail to lower the opportunity for sexual selection among females or fail to elevate it for males; (ii) how post‐mating events might influence sexual selection; and (iii) the role of females as active participants in sexual selection. We also highlight that inadequate data reporting in the literature prevented us from extracting effect sizes from many studies that had presumably collected the relevant data.

A rigorous comparison of sexual selection indexes via simulations of diverse mating systems

HOMAGE TO BATEMAN: SEX ROLES PREDICT SEX DIFFERENCES IN SEXUAL SELECTION

Simulations provide a mechanistic interpretation of Bateman gradients

ON THE OPPORTUNITY FOR SEXUAL SELECTION, THE BATEMAN GRADIENT AND THE MAXIMUM INTENSITY OF SEXUAL SELECTION

Sexual selection gradients change over time in a simultaneous hermaphrodite

Adaptations to sexual selection and sexual conflict: insights from experimental evolution and artificial selection

Does the potential strength of sexual selection differ between mating systems with and without defensive behaviours? A meta‐analysis

Sexual selection: competition for resources provided by mating partners

The correlation between anisogamy and sexual selection intensity—the broad theoretical predictions

Unifying quantification methods for sexual selection and assortative mating using information theory

Not all sex ratios are equal: the Fisher condition, parental care and sexual selection

Softness of selection and mating system interact to shape trait evolution under sexual conflict

The information theory formalism unifies the detection of the patterns of sexual selection and assortative mating for both discrete and quantitative traits

The multinomial index: a robust measure of reproductive skew

The logic of conventional and reversed Bateman gradients

Sexual selection on morphological and physiological traits and fluctuating asymmetry in the black scavenger fly Sepsis cynipsea

Socio-ecological context modulates significance of territorial contest competition in Drosophila prolongata

Mate choice theory and the mode of selection in sexual populations

Operational sex ratio but not density affects sexual selection in a fish

Comparative sexual selection in field and laboratory in a guild of sepsid dung flies

Evolution of female choice under intralocus sexual conflict and genotype-by-environment interactions