Proposed new definition of exercise pulmonary hypertension decreases false-positive cases

Gabor Kovacs,Alexander Avian,Horst Olschewski
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01394-2015
IF: 24.3
2016-01-07
European Respiratory Journal
Abstract:The exercise part of the haemodynamic definition of pulmonary hypertension (PH) was used between the first (1973) [1] and fourth (2008) [2] world conferences on PH for patients with a mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) >30 mmHg during exercise. However, at the World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension in Dana Point in 2008, this part of the PH definition was abandoned, mainly due to the fact that pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) values during exercise are strongly dependent on age and exercise level [3], and a definition based on a single parameter such as PAP may not be reliable. The analysis of historical studies [3, 4] and the generation of novel data [5–8] have led to a better understanding of exercise haemodynamics. Herve et al. [7] suggest a new definition of exercise-PH that includes not only PAP, but also total pulmonary resistance (TPR), calculated as mPAP/cardiac output, representing the steepness of PAP increase during exercise. According to this definition, exercise-PH may be diagnosed if during maximal exercise mPAP >30 mmHg and TPR >3 Wood units (WU). This may reduce the number of false positive exercise-PH diagnoses in healthy subjects who develop high mPAP values at excessive exercise levels. The proposed novel definition for exercise-PH reduces numbers of false positives and may be an important step forward http://ow.ly/U2z7n
respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?