Abstract:This Article explores the relationship between two key areas of farming regulation: food safety and environmental protection. Focusing on the 2010 Food Safety Modernization Act, which directs the Federal Food and Drug Administration to promulgate rules governing produce safety on farms, this Article identifies a number of tradeoffs between these two areas. Many of these tradeoffs are not immediately apparent on the face of the Food Safety Modernization Act or its implementing rules and arise only as a result of farmers’ particular implementation choices. Like other agriculture regulation, the Food Safety Modernization Act relies on cooperative governance, allowing regulated entities to play a major role in the regulatory process. Thus, many details of the regulatory scheme are determined only after rulemaking is over. Unfortunately, most of the existing administrative law tools that manage tradeoffs between various regulatory goals — for example, cost-benefit analysis and interagency consultation — focus on the rulemaking process itself, and, as such, are poorly suited to address the tradeoffs that inevitably are made in the post-rulemaking implementation phase. There is therefore a mismatch between most risk tradeoff analysis tools — which are aimed at improving the decision-making of agencies during rulemaking — and agricultural cooperative governance schemes, which ultimately delegate tradeoff analysis to farmers to conduct during rule implementation. As a result, regulated entities engage in tradeoff analysis without adequate oversight or accountability. Because farmers are likely to be biased in favor of food safety and against environmental protection, the former is likely to win out regardless of whether the outcome is in the public interest. This Article calls for development of a systematic analytical tool to manage regulatory tradeoffs during rule implementation.

Farmers’ market governance and its role on consumer motives and outcomes

Between Social Capital and Formal Governance in Farmer Cooperatives: Evidence from China

Exploring Multiple Drivers of Cooperative Governance: a Paired Case Comparison of Vegetable Growing Cooperatives in the UK and China

Food Safety Controls in Different Governance Structures in China's Vegetable and Fruit Industry

New Online Market Connecting Chinese Consumers and Small Farms to Improve Food Safety and Environment

Adoption of nontraditional governance characteristics in US farmer cooperatives

Governance Structure of Chinese Farmer Cooperatives: Evidence from Zhejiang Province

Overcoming the Legacy of the Past? Analyzing the Modes of Governance Used by the Polish Agricultural Producer Groups

Promoting Farmers' Markets: Preferences of Farmers' Market Leaders

Contribution of Farmers’ Markets to More Socially Sustainable Food Systems: A Pilot Study of a Farmers’ Market in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT), Australia

Regulating Farming: Balancing Food Safety and Environmental Protection in a Cooperative Governance Regime

Citizen Participation Practices in the Governance of Local Food Systems: A Literature Review

A qualitative study of shopper experiences at an urban farmers' market using the Stanford Healthy Neighborhood Discovery Tool

The impacts of the Farmers Market and Local Food Promotion programs

Seeking fresh food and supporting local producers: perceptions and motivations of farmers’ market customers

Does direct farm marketing fulfill its promises? analyzing job satisfaction among direct-market farmers in Canada

Transnational Business Governance Interactions in Food Safety Regulation: Exploring the Promises and Risks of Enrolment

How food systems change (or not): governance implications for system transformation processes

Environmental, social and economic perceptions of local food production: a case study of Aberdeenshire farmers' markets

Growing Connections: Local Food Systems and Community Resilience

Models of governance in community gardening: administrative support fosters project longevity