Thermal Inactivation of Avian Viral and Bacterial Pathogens in an Effluent Treatment System within a Biosafety Level 2 and 3 Enhanced Facility

Revis Chmielewski,Michael Day,Stephen Spatz,Qingzhong Yu,Richard Gast,Laslo Zsak,David Swayne
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/153567601101600402
2011-12-01
Applied Biosafety
Abstract:Avian influenza (AI) virus, avian paramyxovirus Type 1 (APMV-1 or NDV), reovirus, rotavirus, turkey astrovirus (TAst), avian metapneumovirus (aMPV), Marek's disease virus (MDV-1), avian parvovirus (ChPV), and Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis are significant biosafety level 2 (BSL-2) or biosafety level 3 enhanced (BSL-3E) pathogens of poultry that are studied in veterinary medical research laboratories worldwide. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a moderate temperature, effluent decontamination system (EDS) to inactivate avian pathogens. First, the thermal inactivation processes for AI virus, APMV-1, reovirus, and rotaviruses were determined in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) using in vitro assays from which thermal death rates (Dt) and changes in heat resistance (zD) of the AI virus and APMV-1 were determined at various time/temperature parameters. The PBS validation process demonstrated that 6 log10 reduction was achieved following heating at 82.2°C within 30 seconds for AI virus and APMV-1, 1.8 minutes for astrovirus, while reoviruses and rotaviruses were destroyed within 3 minutes. Second, to determine whether pathogens were adequately inactivated in a moderate temperature EDS system, vials containing avian viruses (5.1-11.1 log10 TCID, EID50/ml, or infectious particle/ml) and bacteria (9.1 log10 cfu/ml) were placed in the effluent tank and exposed to a standard cycle of 82.2°C for 6 hours. The EDS process totally inactivated enveloped and non-enveloped viruses with complete inactivation of greater than 5.1-11.1 log10 TCID/ml of specific pathogens. The data from the inactivation models and the EDS validation test showed that the 6 log10 reduction required for a sanitary assurance level of effluent was achieved with a significant margin of safety.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?