Abstract:Background: Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease that poses a substantial burden on individuals and the health care system. Despite published national guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma, considerable care gaps exist. Suboptimal adherence to asthma diagnosis and management guidelines contributes to poor patient outcomes. The integration of electronic tools (eTools) into electronic medical records (EMRs) represents a knowledge translation opportunity to support best practices. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine how best to integrate evidence-based asthma eTools into primary care EMRs across Ontario and Canada to improve adherence to guidelines as well as measure and monitor performance. Methods: In total, 2 focus groups comprising physicians and allied health professionals who were considered experts in primary care, asthma, and EMRs were convened. One focus group also included a patient participant. Focus groups used a semistructured discussion-based format to consider the optimal methods for integrating asthma eTools into EMRs. Discussions were held on the web via Microsoft Teams (Microsoft Corp). The first focus group discussed integrating asthma indicators into EMRs using eTools, and participants completed a questionnaire evaluating the clarity, relevance, and feasibility of collecting asthma performance indicator data at the point of care. The second focus group addressed how to incorporate eTools for asthma into a primary care setting and included a questionnaire evaluating the perceived utility of various eTools. Focus group discussions were recorded and analyzed using thematic qualitative analysis. The responses to focus group questionnaires were assessed using descriptive quantitative analysis. Results: Qualitative analysis of the 2 focus group discussions revealed 7 key themes: designing outcome-oriented tools, gaining stakeholder trust, facilitating open lines of communication, prioritizing the end user, striving for efficiency, ensuring adaptability, and developing within existing workflows. In addition, 24 asthma indicators were rated according to clarity, relevance, feasibility, and overall usefulness. In total, 5 asthma performance indicators were identified as the most relevant. These included smoking cessation support, monitoring using objective measures, the number of emergency department visits and hospitalizations, assessment of asthma control, and presence of an asthma action plan. The eTool questionnaire responses revealed that the Asthma Action Plan Wizard and Electronic Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire were perceived to be the most useful in primary care. Conclusions: Primary care physicians, allied health professionals, and patients consider that eTools for asthma care present a unique opportunity to improve adherence to best-practice guidelines in primary care and collect performance indicators. The strategies and themes identified in this study can be leveraged to overcome barriers associated with asthma eTool integration into primary care EMRs. The most beneficial indicators and eTools, along with the key themes identified, will guide future asthma eTool implementation.

Patients’ needs in asthma treatment: development and initial validation of the NEAT questionnaire

Enabling patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to identify and express their support needs to health care professionals: A qualitative study to develop a tool

A contribution to the validation of the Needs Evaluation Questionnaire (NEQ): a study in the Italian context

Assessing patients’ acceptance of their medication to reveal unmet needs: results from a large multi-diseases study using a patient online community

Translation and validation of the Chinese version of Patient-completed Asthma Knowledge Questionnaire and its implementation in patient education

Validation of the Standardized Needs Evaluation Questionnaire in Polish Cancer Patients

Evaluation of a short form for measuring health-related quality of life among pediatric asthma patients

Psychometric assessment of the Adherence to Asthma Medication Questionnaire in asthma patients in China: a validation study

Psychometric Properties of the Needs Assessment Tool-Progressive Disease Cancer in U.K. Primary Care

Integrating User Preferences for Asthma Tools and Clinical Guidelines Into Primary Care Electronic Medical Records: Mixed Methods Study

Concurrent validity, cut-offs and ability to change of patient-reported outcome measures for rhinitis and asthma in MASK-air®

Is the EQ-5D fit for purpose in asthma? Acceptability and content validity from the patient perspective

Development and validation of an electronic daily control score for asthma (e-DASTHMA): a real-world direct patient data study

Patient-reported outcome instruments that evaluate adherence behaviours in adults with asthma: a systematic review of measurement properties

Measuring patients experience of nursing quality in acute hospitals: review of existing scales and development and psychometric validation of a new scale

Assessing patient experience with patient safety in primary care: development and validation of the ASK-ME-questionnaire

Understanding patient perception of asthma biologic treatment response

Development and validation of the needs of children questionnaire: An instrument to measure children's self-reported needs in hospital

Development and measurement properties of the AxEL (attitude toward education and advice for low-back-pain) questionnaire

Measuring the quality of anaesthesia from a patient's perspective: development, validation, and implementation of a short questionnaire

Development and Validation of a Dual-Language (English and Malay) Needs Assessment Tool for Breast Cancer (NeAT-BC)