Abstract:It has been reported that the pavement performance predicted by the current mechanistic-empirical pavement design shows low or no sensitivity to subgrade and unbound layers. This issue has raised wide attention. Targeting this problem, this paper summarizes the process used by the authors to find better models of the influence of subgrade and unbound base course layers on the performance of flexible and rigid pavements. A comprehensive literature review is first conducted and the findings are categorized. It is found that the resilient modulus, permanent deformation, shear strength, and erosion are key factors. In particular, the properties that provide greater sensitivity are (1) the moisture-dependency of the modulus, shear strength, and permanent deformation; (2) stress-dependency of the modulus and permanent deformation; and (3) cross-anisotropy of the modulus. A number of unbound layer/subgrade models have been located and categorized. Three criteria are developed to identify the candidate models in terms of the degree of susceptibility, degree of accuracy, and ease of development. The first two criteria are used to evaluate the collected unbound layer/subgrade models, while associated development and implementation issues are planned as subsequent work. Two models that the authors previously developed are selected as examples to illustrate the improvement of the performance prediction, including the moisture-sensitive, stress-dependent, and cross-anisotropic modulus model for unbound layers and stress-dependent mechanistic-empirical permanent deformation model for unbound base layers. These two models are verified through laboratory tests and numerical simulations. Moreover, they are compared to their counterparts in the AASHTOWare Pavement ME Design. The advantages of accuracy and sensitivity to the operational conditions (e.g. moisture, traffic stress, and load-induced/particle-induced anisotropy) are obvious. In addition to these two models, the development of the shear strength model and erosion model are sketched. The candidate models need further development and implementation, which address issues such as hierarchical inputs, calibration/validation, and implementation. These are the on-going and planned work on this topic to better incorporate the influence of subgrade and unbound layers so as to contribute to the improvement of pavement designs.

Calibration of National Rigid Pavement Performance Models for the Pavement Mechanistic–Empirical Design Guide

Development of a New Faulting Model in Jointed Concrete Pavement Using LTPP Data

Development of an Artificial Neural Network-Based K-Value Prediction Model to Improve the Sensitivity of Base Layer on Rigid Pavement Performance

Mechanistic-empirical Models for Better Consideration of Subgrade and Unbound Layers Influence on Pavement Performance

Development of a Modulus of Subgrade Reaction Model to Improve Slab-Base Interface Bond Sensitivity

Systematical Calibration and Validation of Discrete Element Models for Fiber Reinforced Cement Treated Aggregates

A Calibrated Mechanics-Based Model for Top-Down Cracking of Asphalt Pavements

Approaches for local calibration of mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide joint faulting model: a case study of Ontario

Calibrating the Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide Rutting Models using Accelerated Pavement Testing

Comparison of Flexible Pavement Designs: Mechanistic-Empirical (NCHRP1-37A) Versus Empirical (AASHTO 1993) Flexible Pavement Design Using Available Local Calibration Models

Numerical Modeling of Geogrid-Reinforced Flexible Pavement and Corresponding Validation Using Large-Scale Tank Test

Parametric Study of Modified Subgrade Reaction Model Using Artificial Neural Network Approach

A Mechanistic-Empirical Approach to Quantify the Influence of Geogrid on the Performance of Flexible Pavement Structures

Proposed Enhancements to Pavement ME Design: Improved Consideration of the Influence of Subgrade and Unbound Layers on Pavement Performance

Prediction of Geogrid-Reinforced Flexible Pavement Performance Using Artificial Neural Network Approach

Review of Mechanistic-Empirical Modeling of Top-Down Cracking in Asphalt Pavements

State Design Procedure for Rigid Pavements Based on the AASHTO Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide

Evaluation of Design Procedure and Performance of Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement According to AASHTO Design Methods

Local calibration of the fatigue cracking models in the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide for Tennessee

Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Parameters for Advanced Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement (CRCP) Punchout Calibration Model

Improved Sensitivity of Base Layer on the Performance of Rigid Pavement