Cognitive reserve in individuals with frontotemporal dementia: a systematic review
Lauren A. Grebe Jet M.J. Vonk Elizabeth E. Galletta Mira Goral a Communication Sciences and Disorders,St. John's University,Queens,NY,USAb Speech-Language-Hearing sciences,The Graduate Center,The City University of New York,New York,NY,USAc Memory and Aging Center,Department of Neurology,University of California San Francisco,San Francisco,CA,USAd Department of Rehabilitation Medicine,NYU Grossman School of Medicine,New York,NY,USAe Speech-Language-Hearing sciences,Lehman College,The City University of New York,Bronx,NY,USAf Communication Sciences & Disorders,SUNY Plattsburgh,Plattsburgh,NY,USA
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2024.2410207
2024-10-19
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
Abstract:As the literature related to cognitive reserve (CR) in individuals with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is only emerging, a clear consensus on the relationship among CR proxies, brain status, and clinical performance has not been reached. The primary aim of this systematic review was to examine the relationship among sociobehavioral proxies of CR, brain status, and clinical performance in individuals with various types of FTD. Additionally, characteristics of patient population, sociobehavioral proxies, disease severity tools, and brain status measures used were identified. The systematic review was conducted using comprehensive search terms in Medline, PsychINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science. Eligibility criteria were for studies to include at least one CR and one brain status measure for individuals with FTD, be published in a peer-reviewed journal, and be published in English. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used to assess study quality and bias risk. A total of 237 titles and abstracts were screened, with 13 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Together, these studies report 1,423 participants with FTD. Based on the included studies, partial support was demonstrated for CR in individuals with FTD when education, occupation, and leisure were utilized as CR proxies. The variability in results among studies could be related to the different tools used to measure CR, brain status, and disease severity. This review provides recommendations for future studies: incorporating longitudinal designs, in depth neuropsychological testing, consistent disease duration measure, and transparant statistical output reporting.
psychology, clinical,clinical neurology