Development of Syntax-Discourse Interface Knowledge in 3- to 6-Year-Old Mandarin Chinese Speaking Children
Yuan Xie,Sergey Avrutin,Peter Coopmans
2020-01-01
Abstract:Bridging refers a discourse operation that allows speakers to use a definite DP without previous mention of a corresponding indefinite (e.g., in the sequence “A ship is on the river. The flag is blue.”, the flag can be bridged to a ship). Children’s ability to build such bridges between a definite DP and a preceding indefinite one has mainly been explored in Indo-European languages (Avrutin & Coopmans, 2000; Van Hout, De Ree & De Ree, 2008). Results showed that children were unable to successfully build such a bridge at age 3 (no difference from chance level performance). It was only after the age of 4 that they began to demonstrate the knowledge of bridging. The mistakes that very young children make in this bridging task have been explained as resulting from their inability to appreciate the addressee’s perspective (Van Hout, De Ree & De Ree, 2008), from having a wider implicit common ground than adults (‘Concept of NonShared Assumption’, Schaeffer & Matthewson, 2005), from over-evaluating the information status of the definite DPs (De Cat, 2013) or from insufficient processing resources ( Avrutin & Coopmans, 2000). The plausibility of these explanatory accounts may gain further support by evidence from other than Indo-European languages. To our knowledge, Mandarin Chinese children’s ability to build bridges has not been explored yet.1 Yet, this language presents an interesting case study due to the absence of morphological marking of definiteness. Chinese does not have overt articles, by which such properties as definiteness can be expressed, and instead can use word order to do so (e.g. preverbal position). The bridging mechanism may also be seen to underlie linking constructions involving the reflexive pronoun. Schumacher et al (2010) has shown how the connection between a SELF morpheme in a complex reflexive like himself and its antecedent can be viewed in this way. This is so because the SELF morpheme