Comparison of clinical practice guidelines on radiation dermatitis: a narrative review

Samuel Finkelstein,Lauren Kanee,Tara Behroozian,Julie Ryan Wolf,Corina van den Hurk,Edward Chow,Pierluigi Bonomo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06829-6
IF: 3.1
2022-01-24
Supportive Care in Cancer
Abstract:PurposeRadiation dermatitis (RD) is a common side effect of radiation therapy (RT). While many different treatment strategies are currently used to address RD, there is a lack of consensus and RD prophylaxis and management guidelines have remained largely unchanged over the last 10 years. This review aims to formulate unambiguous supportive care interventions by comparing RD clinical practice guidelines published between 2010 and 2021 by several organizations: Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC), British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA), Cancer Care Manitoba (CCMB), Oncology Nursing Society (ONS), Society and College of Radiographers (SCoR), and International Society of Nurses in Cancer Care (ISNCC).MethodsAreas of agreement and discordance were assessed among the MASCC, BCCA, CCMB, ONS, SCoR, and ISNCC guidelines.ResultsTreatment recommendations across guidelines for acute RD and chronic RT-induced skin toxicities have been summarized. The strongest agreement among the guidelines exists for the use of topical corticosteroids, silver sulfadiazine, washing, and deodorant. All guidelines recommend the use of topical corticosteroids, and washing with water and soap is consistently supported. There is minimal consensus on an optimal dressing or barrier film for RD prophylaxis or management. MASCC weakly recommends prophylactic use of silver sulfadiazine to reduce RD, while BCCA, CCMB, and SCoR recommend its use upon signs of infection. MASCC and CCMB recommend the use of a long-pulsed dye laser to manage telangiectasia, a late effect of RT.ConclusionsGiven the extent of discordance among guideline recommendations, further research is recommended to establish optimal treatments for RD prophylaxis and management.
oncology,health care sciences & services,rehabilitation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?