Abstract:A basic underlying assumption in most of the research to date is that intermediate industry accounts of the economies in multiregional input-output (MRIO) tables exist and are accurate. In fact, if they exist at the subnational level, such accounts are, at best, roughly estimated and predicated on far less empirical information than is available for economies of nations. Moreover, intra- economy intermediate-industry flows are typically larger than the set of a region's commodity in- and out-flows. So, if intermediate industry flows in a set of MRIO accounts are noticeably mis-estimated, it follows that interregional trade coincidentally derived using them must be even more conspicuously in error. We hypothesize as more information is used to estimate MRIO accounts, the better the estimates should be. We start our experiment by consolidating 2019 FIGARO accounts of the 27 member states of the European Union, while maintaining sectoral detail, to produce a "national account". We then test several approaches to constructing MRIO tables. The approaches distribute interregional trade fully by receiving industry, as in FIGARO, as well as strictly in the form of a diagonalized matrix as if the commodity inflows are competitive imports. To do this, both a gravity model and RAS are applied to each approach. We then test to see how well the approaches estimate main features of FIGARO's MRIO accounts and detail a rather consistent ranking of the relative accuracy of them. We also find that the level of error inherent to the estimated MRIOs is markedly similar across approaches, particularly for multipliers. Further, relaxing interregional trade to a diagonalized matrix tends to add very little error. The approach that uses the least data is, however, markedly worse in replicating countries' direct requirements matrices and Leontief inverses, which suggests its use in a more-limited set of applications.

Accounting for value added embodied in trade and consumption: an intercomparison of global multiregional input–output databases

Full‐scale, Near Real‐time Multi‐regional Input–output Table for the Global Emerging Economies (EMERGING)

Estimating the uncertainty of the greenhouse gas emission accounts in global multi-regional input–output analysis

INVESTIGATING ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO HARMONISE MULTI-REGIONAL INPUT–OUTPUT DATA

A Cross-Country Study of Carbon Footprint Using MRIO Model

Revisiting Methods for Estimating Interregional Input-Output Accounts: It's Not Just About Trade Flows

Measuring what matters in value-added trade

Emissions burden shifting in global value chains – winners and losers under multi-regional versus bilateral accounting

Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agricultural Non-Tariff Measures: Evidence Based on Ad Valorem Equivalent Estimates

Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics in Measuring Carbon Footprints: Disentangling Structure and Artifact in Input-Output Accounting

EXIOBASE energy accounts: Improving precision in an open‐sourced procedure applicable to any MRIO database

CARBON EMISSION ACCOUNTING IN MRIO MODELS: THE TERRITORY VS. THE RESIDENCE PRINCIPLE

Multi-region input-output analysis of embodied emissions and intensities: Spatial aggregation by linking regional and global datasets

Global overview for energy use of the world economy: Household-consumption-based accounting based on the world input-output database (WIOD)

Follow the Value Added: Bilateral Gross Export Accounting

Accounting for the Differences Between Gross and Value Added Trade Balances

Mapping Flows of Embodied Emissions in the Global Production System.

A CARBON FOOTPRINT TIME SERIES OF THE UK – RESULTS FROM A MULTI-REGION INPUT–OUTPUT MODEL

Entropy-based Chinese city-level MRIO table framework

Regionalizing the supply chain in process life cycle inventory with multiregional input–output data: An implementation for ecoinvent with EXIOBASE