Abstract:Background: In quantitative biology, mathematical models are used to describe and analyze biological processes. The parameters of these models are usually unknown and need to be estimated from experimental data using statistical methods. In particular, Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods have become increasingly popular as they allow for a rigorous analysis of parameter and prediction uncertainties without the need for assuming parameter identifiability or removing non-identifiable parameters. A broad spectrum of MCMC algorithms have been proposed, including single- and multi-chain approaches. However, selecting and tuning sampling algorithms suited for a given problem remains challenging and a comprehensive comparison of different methods is so far not available. Results: We present the results of a thorough benchmarking of state-of-the-art single- and multi-chain sampling methods, including Adaptive Metropolis, Delayed Rejection Adaptive Metropolis, Metropolis adjusted Langevin algorithm, Parallel Tempering and Parallel Hierarchical Sampling. Different initialization and adaptation schemes are considered. To ensure a comprehensive and fair comparison, we consider problems with a range of features such as bifurcations, periodical orbits, multistability of steady-state solutions and chaotic regimes. These problem properties give rise to various posterior distributions including uni- and multi-modal distributions and non-normally distributed mode tails. For an objective comparison, we developed a pipeline for the semi-automatic comparison of sampling results. Conclusion: The comparison of MCMC algorithms, initialization and adaptation schemes revealed that overall multi-chain algorithms perform better than single-chain algorithms. In some cases this performance can be further increased by using a preceding multi-start local optimization scheme. These results can inform the selection of sampling methods and the benchmark collection can serve for the evaluation of new algorithms. Furthermore, our results confirm the need to address exploration quality of MCMC chains before applying the commonly used quality measure of effective sample size to prevent false analysis conclusions.

A simple introduction to Markov Chain Monte–Carlo sampling

Importance Sampling of Interval Markov Chains

A Conceptual Introduction to Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods

Data Analysis Recipes: Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo

Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)

Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice

Markov chain Monte Carlo methods in biostatistics

Stochastic Gradient Markov Chain Monte Carlo

An introduction to the Markov chain Monte Carlo method

Analyzing MCMC Output

Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods, a survey with some frequent misunderstandings

An effective introduction to the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method

Understanding Linchpin Variables in Markov Chain Monte Carlo

Multicanonical MCMC for Sampling Rare Events

Informed sub-sampling MCMC: approximate Bayesian inference for large datasets

Complex-valued Bayesian parameter estimation via Markov chain Monte Carlo

Post-Processing of MCMC

Graph-accelerated Markov Chain Monte Carlo using Approximate Samples

A calculus for Markov chain Monte Carlo: studying approximations in algorithms

Comprehensive benchmarking of Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for dynamical systems

An invitation to adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo convergence theory