TP53 co-mutations as an independent prognostic factor in 2nd and further line therapy—EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer IV patients treated with osimertinib

Julia Roeper,Petros Christopoulos,Markus Falk,Lukas C. Heukamp,Markus Tiemann,Albrecht Stenzinger,Michael Thomas,Frank Griesinger
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-21-754
2022-01-01
Translational Lung Cancer Research
Abstract:BACKGROUND: The negative prognostic and predictive value of <i>TP53</i> co-mutations (<i>TP53</i> mt+) in <i>EGFR</i> mutated (<i>EGFR</i> mt+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is increasingly being acknowledged. Data consistently show that <i>TP53</i> mt+ impact negatively on 1st line objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with 1st and 2nd generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). However, a negative predictive impact has not been shown for the 3rd generation TKI Osimertinib. Therefore, we investigated the impact of <i>TP53</i> mt+ in <i>EGFR</i> mt+ NSCLC carrying a T790M resistance mutation and treated in 2nd/further lines with Osimertinib.METHODS: A total of 77 <i>EGFR</i> mt+ NSCLC IV patients carrying a T790M resistance mutation from two institutions were analyzed for <i>TP53</i> mt+. Clinical data including sex, age, presence of CNS metastases, etc., as well as types of <i>EGFR</i> and <i>TP53</i> mt+ were captured. PFS and OS were calculated from the start of Osimertinib.RESULTS: <i>TP53</i> mt+ were found in 32/77 patients (42%). <i>TP53</i> mt+ was a statistically significant independent negative predictive factor for PFS and OS. PFS for <i>TP53</i> mt+ patients were 9 months <i>vs.</i> 14 months for patients with <i>TP53</i> wild-type (<i>TP53</i>WT) (P&lt;0.008). OS for <i>TP53</i> mt+ patients was 16 months <i>vs.</i> 24 months patients with <i>TP53</i>WT (P&lt;0.025).CONCLUSIONS: <i>TP53</i> mt+ have a negative impact on PFS and OS in a group of patients carrying a sensitizing <i>EGFR</i> mt+ and a T790M resistance mutation treated with Osimertinib. These data, together with the data for 1st/2nd generation TKI in 1st line treatment call for additional therapeutic and management concepts for this subgroup of patients.
oncology,respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?