A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Individual Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Child-Centered Therapy for Child Anxiety Disorders

Jennifer S. Silk,Patricia Z. Tan,Cecile D. Ladouceur,Suzanne Meller,Greg J. Siegle,Dana L. McMakin,Erika E. Forbes,Ronald E. Dahl,Philip C. Kendall,Anthony Mannarino,Neal D. Ryan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2016.1138408

2016-03-16

Abstract:This study compared individual cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and a supportive child-centered therapy (CCT) for child anxiety disorders on rates of treatment response and recovery at posttreatment and 1-year follow-up, as well as on real-world measures of emotional functioning. Youth (N = 133; ages 9-14) with anxiety disorders (generalized, separation, and/or social anxiety) were randomized using a 2:1 ratio to CBT (n = 90) or CCT (n = 43), which served as an active comparison. Treatment response and recovery at posttreatment and 1-year follow-up were assessed by Independent Evaluators, and youth completed ecological momentary assessment of daily emotions throughout treatment. The majority of youth in both CBT and CCT were classified as treatment responders (71.1% for CBT, 55.8% for CCT), but youth treated with CBT were significantly more likely to fully recover, no longer meeting diagnostic criteria for any of the targeted anxiety disorders and no longer showing residual symptoms (66.7% for CBT vs. 46.5% for CCT). Youth treated with CBT also reported significantly lower negative emotions associated with recent negative events experienced in daily life during the latter stages of treatment relative to youth treated with CCT. Furthermore, a significantly higher percentage of youth treated with CBT compared to CCT were in recovery at 1-year follow-up (82.2% for CBT vs. 65.1% for CCT). These findings indicate potential benefits of CBT above and beyond supportive therapy on the breadth, generalizability, and durability of treatment-related gains.

psychology, clinical, developmental

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the difference in efficacy between Individual Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (I - CBT) and Child - Centered Therapy (CCT) in treating children's anxiety disorders (including generalized anxiety disorder, separation anxiety disorder, and social anxiety disorder). Specifically, researchers hope to compare the differences between these two treatment methods in terms of treatment response rate, full recovery rate, and improvement in emotional function in daily life through a randomized clinical trial.

### Research Background
- **Known Effectiveness**: Previous studies have shown that for children's anxiety disorders, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is more effective than the waiting control group. However, when comparing individual CBT with active control treatments (such as education and support), the results are inconsistent, which raises concerns about the specific effects of CBT.
- **Challenges in Community Implementation**: Although CBT has been proven effective, there are still many obstacles to its promotion and implementation in the community.
- **Research Purpose**: In order to better guide resource investment decisions, this study aims to determine whether CBT has a significant advantage in treating common children's anxiety disorders, especially in the face of other treatment methods that are more accessible in the community.

### Research Design
- **Participants**: The study included 133 children aged 9 to 14 years who had generalized anxiety disorder, separation anxiety disorder, and/or social anxiety disorder.
- **Interventions**: Participants were randomly assigned to the individual CBT group (n = 90) or the CCT group (n = 43) at a ratio of 2:1.
- **Assessment Methods**: The immediate post - treatment and 1 - year follow - up effects were evaluated by independent evaluators, and the Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) method was used to assess changes in emotions in daily life.

### Main Hypotheses
- **Main Objectives**:
- Compare the differences in treatment response rate and full recovery rate between CBT and CCT.
- Evaluate the impact of the two treatment methods on negative emotions in daily life.
- **Specific Hypotheses**:
- Children receiving CBT treatment will have a higher treatment response rate and full recovery rate after treatment and at the 1 - year follow - up.
- Children receiving CBT treatment will report lower negative emotions related to recent negative events in the later stage of treatment.

Through this study, the author hopes to provide more comprehensive evidence to support the superiority of CBT in treating children's anxiety disorders and provide a basis for further clinical practice and policy - making.