Abstract:Researchers misunderstand their role in creating ethical problems when they allow dogmas to purportedly divorce scientists and scientific practices from the values that they embody. Cortina (J Bus Ethics. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04195-8">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04195-8</a>, <a href="/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04189-6#ref-CR200">2019</a>), Edwards (J Bus Ethics. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04197-6">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04197-6</a>, <a href="/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04189-6#ref-CR202">2019</a>), and Powell (J Bus Ethics. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04196-7">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04196-7</a>, <a href="/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04189-6#ref-CR206">2019</a>) help us clarify and further develop our position by responding to our critique of, and alternatives to, this misleading separation. In this rebuttal, we explore how the desire to achieve the separation of facts and values is unscientific on the very terms endorsed by its advocates—this separation is refuted by empirical observation. We show that positivists like Cortina and Edwards offer no rigorous theoretical or empirical justifications to substantiate their claims, let alone critique ours. Following Powell, we point to how classical pragmatism understands 'purpose' in scientific pursuits while also providing an alternative to the dogmas of positivism and related philosophical positions. In place of dogmatic, unscientific cries about an abstract and therefore always-unobservable 'reality,' we invite all organizational scholars to join us in shifting the discussion about quantitative research towards empirically grounded scientific inquiry. This makes the ethics of actual people and their practices central to quantitative research, including the thoughts, discourses, and behaviors of researchers who are always in particular places doing particular things. We propose that quantitative researchers can thus start to think about their research practices as a kind of work, rather than having the status of a kind of dogma. We conclude with some implications that this has for future research and education, including the relevance of research and research methods.

Thinking boxes, behavioural boys and the politics of love: ‘Doing’ post-qualitative social work research

Objects of conflict: (re) configuring early childhood experiences of gender in the preschool classroom

Fieldnotes and situational analysis in environmental education research: experiments in new materialism

Post-critical writing praxis as a qualitative researcher

From Aristotle to Arendt: A phenomenological exploration of forms of knowledge and practice in the context of child protection social work in the UK

Critical Practice for Challenging Times: Social Workers' Engagement with Community Work

Critical posthumanisms, postqualitative inquiry, and conventional qualitative research: some interrogations and contemplations on their entangled identities and futurities

Re-presenting, performing critical/post-critical research realities

Challenging behaviour around challenging behaviour

Failing ethnographies as post-qualitative possibilities: reflections from critical posthumanities and critical disability studies

Working back to the future: strengthening radical social work with children and young people, and their perspectives on resilience, capabilities and overcoming adversity

Thinking OutsideTheBox - Designing Smart Things with Autistic Children

Making Quantitative Research Work: From Positivist Dogma to Actual Social Scientific Inquiry

Foucauldian Discourse Analysis in Psychology: Reflecting on a Hybrid Reading of Foucault When Researching “Ethical Subjects”

When Methods Meet Motives: methodological pluralism in Social Work research

Qualitative Research in the Chinese Social Work Academy: Optimism and Invisible Disadvantages

Doing Child-Centered Ethnography: Unravelling the Complexities of Reducing the Perceptions of Adult Male Power During Fieldwork

Exploring the experiences of autistic pupils through creative research methods: Reflections on a participatory approach

A new model of collaborative action research; theorising from inter-professional practice development

Dialectical critical realism, transformative change and social work

Towards a Butlerian methodology: Undoing organizational performativity through anti-narrative research