“Leaping Poodle” (Springender Pudel)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-016-0462-0
2016-03-15
IIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law
Abstract:If, in a sign composed of a word and a figure, the composition of the overall appearance, the arrangement of the trade mark’s components and the beginning of the word are identical with a well-known combined mark (here: the figurative component of a leaping animal from the same perspective, in the same posture, facing the same direction), one can assume a figurative similarity between the signs.The proprietor of a well-known trade mark can request the cancellation of a trade mark even if no risk of confusion is present but the similarities between the opposing signs are so great that the relevant public makes a mental association between the contested sign and the well-known trade mark.A proprietor of a well-known mark protected by trade mark registration is not required to accept the establishment of trade mark protection in respect of identical or similar goods for a sign that infringes his trade mark right, even if the sign refers in a humorous manner to the well-known trade mark and as a trade mark parody falls within the scope of protection of artistic freedom.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?