Moderate-intensity constant or high-intensity interval training? Metabolic effects on candidates to undergo bariatric surgery
Javier Enríquez-Schmidt,Camila Mautner Molina,Mariana Kalazich Rosales,Maximiliano Muñoz,Matias Ruiz-Uribe,Francisca Fuentes Leal,Manuel Monrroy Uarac,Carlos Cárcamo Ibaceta,Daniel J. Fazakerley,Mark Larance,Pamela Ehrenfeld,Sergio Martínez-Huenchullán
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2024.03.001
IF: 4.666
2024-03-30
Nutrition Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases
Abstract:Background & aims Bariatric surgery is highly effective against obesity. Pre-surgical exercise programs are recommended to prepare the candidate physically and metabolically for surgery-related rapid weight loss. However, the ideal exercise prescription in this population is unknown. This study aimed to compare the metabolic effects of moderate-intensity constant (MICT) vs. a high-intensity interval training (HIIT) program in candidates to undergo bariatric surgery. Methods and results Twenty-five candidates (22 women) to undergo sleeve gastrectomy aged from 18 to 60 years old were recruited. At baseline, we measured body composition, physical activity levels, grip strength, and aerobic capacity. Further, we assessed metabolic function through glycemia and insulinemia (both fasting and after oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)), homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), lipid profile, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), transaminases, fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21), growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15), apelin, and adiponectin. Afterward, participants were randomized into MICT (n = 14) or HIIT (n = 11). Both training programs consisted of 10 sessions (2–3 times/week, 30 min per session) distributed during 4 weeks before the surgery. After this, all outcomes were measured again at the end of the training programs and 1 month after the surgery (follow-up). A mixed effect with Tukey's post-hoc analysis was performed to compare values at baseline vs. post-training vs. postsurgical follow-up. Both training programs increased aerobic capacity after training (p < 0.05), but only after MICT these changes were kept at follow-up (p < 0.05). However, only MICT decreased fat mass and increased total muscle mass and physical activity levels (p < 0.05). Metabolically, MICT decreased insulinemia after OGTT (p < 0.05), whereas HIIT increased adiponectin after training and GDF15 at follow-up (both p < 0.05). Conclusions Both MICT and HIIT conferred benefits in candidates to undergo bariatric surgery, however, several of those effects were program-specific, suggesting that exercise intensity should be considered when preparing these patients. Future studies should explore the potential benefits of prescribing MICT or HIIT in a customized fashion depending on a pretraining screening, along with possible summatory effects by combining these two exercise programs (MICT + HIIT). Clinical trial registration International Traditional Medicine Clinical Trial Registry, N° ISRCTN42273422.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems,endocrinology & metabolism,nutrition & dietetics