Paradoxes of the influence of small Ni impurity additions in a NaCl crystal on the kinetics of its magnetoplasticity

V. I. Alshits,E. V. Darinskaya,M. V. Koldaeva,E. A. Petrzhik
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/s1063776115130014
2016-01-01
Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics
Abstract:A comparative study of magnetoplasticity in two types of NaCl crystals differing in impurity content only by a small Ni addition (0.06 ppm) in one of them, NaCl(Ni), has been carried out. Two methods of sample magnetic exposure were used: in a constant field B = 0–0.6 T and in crossed fields in the EPR scheme—the Earth’s field BEarth (50 μT) and a variable pumping field $$\tilde B( \sim 1 \mu T)$$ at frequencies ν ~ 1 MHz. In the experiments in the EPR scheme, the change of the field orientation from $$\tilde B \bot B_{Earth}$$ to $$\left. {\tilde B} \right\|B_{Earth}$$ led to almost complete suppression of the effect in the NaCl(Ni) crystals and reduced only slightly (approximately by 20%) the height of the resonance peak of dislocation mean paths in the crystals without Ni, with the amplitude of the mean paths in NaCl(Ni) in the orientation $$\tilde B \bot B_{Earth}$$ having been appreciably lower than that in NaCl. In contrast, upon exposure to a constant magnetic field, a more intense effect was observed in the crystal with Ni. The threshold pumping field amplitude $$\tilde B$$, below which the effect is absent under resonance conditions, for the NaCl(Ni) crystals turned out to be a factor of 5 smaller than that for NaCl, while the thresholds of a constant magnetic field coincide for both types of crystals. All these differences are discussed in detail and interpreted.
physics, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?