Abstract:ABSTRAK Penerapan kebijakan Capital Buffer sangat diperlukan untuk meningkatkan kualitas permodalan bank Syariah. Di satu sisi bank menghadapi dilema untuk tetap mempertahankan keamanan modalnya, atau memilih untuk meningkatkan keuntungan usahanya. Adapun tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui Capital Buffer Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia serta faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya dengan menggunakan metode kausalitas melalui pendekatan kuantitatif. Bank Umum Syariah (BUS) sebanyak 14 BUS menjadi populasi, sedangkan untuk sampel diambil sebanyak 12 BUS selama lima tahun dengan tekhnik purposive sampling. Adapun teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah analisis regresi data panel dengan aplikasi Eviews9. Capital Buffer menjadi variable dependen sedangkan variabel independennya adalah tingkat risiko pembiayaan bermasalah (NPF), tingkat profitabilitas (ROE), ukuran bank (Size) dan tingkat likuiditas (FDR). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan secara parsial tingkat risiko pembiayaan (NPF) tidak berpengaruh terhadap Capital Buffer, tingkat profitabilitas tidak berpengaruh terhadap Capital Buffer, ukuran bank (Size) berpengaruh signifikan negatif terhadap Capital Buffer dan tingkat likuiditas berpengaruh signifikan negatif terhadap Capital Buffer. Implikasi dari penelitian ini yaitu besar atau kecilnya NPF serta tingkat profitabilitas yang dimiliki bank tidak akan terlalu berpengaruh terhadap ketersediaan Capital Buffer, namun semakin besar ukuran bank (aset) dan tingkat likuiditas yang dimiliki bank akan menjadikan Capital Buffer suatu bank dalam keadaan stabil sehingga dalam hal ini bank harus senantiasa meningkatkan kualitas asset dan cadangan likuiditasnya. Kata Kunci: Capital Buffer, NPF, ROE, Bank Size, FDR. ABSTRACT The implementation of the Capital Buffer policy is very much needed to improve the quality of Islamic bank capital. On the one hand, the bank faces a dilemma to maintain the safety of its capital, or choose to increase its business profits. The purpose of this study is to determine the Capital Buffer of Islamic Commercial Banks in Indonesia and the factors that influence it by using the causality method through a quantitative approach. As many as 14 Sharia Commercial Banks (BUS) became the population, while the sample was taken by 12 BUS for five years using purposive sampling technique. The data analysis technique used is panel data regression analysis using the Eviews9 application. Capital Buffer is the dependent variable, while the independent variables are the level of non-performing financing risk (NPF), profitability (ROE), bank size (Size) and liquidity level (FDR). The results showed that partially the level of financing risk (NPF) had no effect on the Capital Buffer, the level of profitability had no effect on the Capital Buffer, the size of the bank (Size) had a significant negative effect on the Capital Buffer and the level of liquidity had a significantly negative effect on the Capital Buffer. The implication of this research is that the size of the NPF and the level of profitability owned by the bank will not greatly affect the availability of Capital Buffers, but the larger the size of the bank (assets) and the level of liquidity owned by the bank will make the Capital Buffer of a bank in a stable condition so that in terms of Banks must always improve the quality of their assets and liquidity reserves. Keywords: Capital Buffer, NPF, ROE, Bank Size, FDR. DAFTAR PUSTAKA Agustuty, L., & Ruslan, A. (2019). Determinan capital buffer pada industri perbankan. Movere Journal, 1(2), 164-174. Andhika, Y. D., & Suprayogi, N. (2017). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi capital adequacy ratio (CAR) bank umum syariah di Indonesia . Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Teori dan Terapan, 4(4), 312-323. https://doi.org/10.20473/vol4iss20174pp312-323 Andiani, L., & Kurnia, K. (2017). Pengaruh risiko, profitabilitas, kebijakan dividen, ukuran, dan likuiditas bank terhadap capital buffer. Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Akuntansi, 6(5), 2013-2031. Anjarwati, K. N., & Ibnu, H., & Madi, R. A. (2016). Determinant capital buffer studi kasus pada bank umum swasta nasional non devisa di Indonesia periode tahun 2012-2016. Jurnal Universitas Halu Oleo Kendari, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/hrmnp Anggitasari, A. A. (2013). Hubungan simultan antara capital buffer dan risiko. Skripsi tidak dipublikasikan. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro. Bayuseno, M. C., & Chabahib, M. (2014). Analisis faktor yang mempengaruhi capial buffer perbankan di Indonesia (Studi pada bank-bank konvensional go public periode 2010-2013). Diponegoro Journal of Management, 3(4), 1-13. Claudio Borio, C. F., Furfine, C., & Lowe, P. (2001). Procyclicality of the financial system and financial stabiity: Issue and policy options. In Bank for International Settlements (ed.), Marrying the macro- and micro-prudential dimensions of financial stability (pp. 1-57). Bank for International Settlements. Distinguin, I., Roulet, C., & Tarazi, A. (2013). Bank regulatory capital and liquidity: Evidence from US and European. Journal of Banking & Finance 37(9), 3295–3317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.04.027 Effendi, T. U. (2018). Analisis faktor internal bank terhadap capital buffer pada industri perbankan di Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Indonesia, 2, 231-241. Fauzia, N. A., & Idris, D. (2016). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi capital buffer (Studi kasus pada bank umum konvensional yang terdaftar di BEI tahun 2011-2014). Diponegoro Journal of Management, 5(2), 354-365. Gursoy, G. A. (2013). The determinants of capital buffer in the Turkish banking system. International Business Research, 6(1), 224-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v6n1p224 Haryanto, S. (2015). Determinan capital buffer: Kajian empirik industri perbankan nasional. Jurnal Ekonomi Modernisasi, 11(2), 108- 123. https://doi.org/10.21067/jem.v11i2.872 Hisan, U. F. C., & Septiarini, D. F. (2020). Pengaruh faktor fundamental dan variabel makroekonomi terhadap capital buffer bank syariah. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Teori dan Terapan, 7(2), 356-371. https://doi.org/10.20473/vol7iss20202pp356-371 Ichtiani, H., Sadalia, I., & Butar, N. A. B. (2017). Analysis of capital buffer in Indonesian banking. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Organizational Innovation (ICOI 2017), 131, 128-132. https://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icoi-17.2017.21 Indrawati, N. K., Salim, U., Hadiwidjojo, D., & Syam, N. (2012). Manajemen risiko berbasis spritual Islam. Ekuitas: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan, 16(2), 184-208. https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2012.v16.i2.217 Kurnia, K., & Andiani, L. (2017). Pengaruh risiko, profitabilitas, kebijakan deviden, ukuran perusahaan dan likuiditas bank terhadap capital buffer. Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Akuntansi, 6(5), 2013-2031. Mishkin, F. (2008). Ekonomi uang, perbankan dan pasar uang. Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Noreen, U., Alamdar, F., & Tariq, T. (2016). Capital buffers and banks risk: Empirical study of adjustment of Pakistani banks. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issue, 6 (4), 1798-1806. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2021). Statistik perbankan Indonesia. Jakarta: Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Pravasanti, Y. A. (2018). Pengaruh NPF dan FDR terhadap CAR dan dampaknya terhadap ROA pada perbankan syariah di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 4(3), 148-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v4i03.302 Purwati, J., Sudarto, & Suwaryo. (2016). Analisis hubungan jangka panjang dan jangka pendek antara NPL, ROE, SIZE dan LOTA terhadap capital buffer. Jurnal Performance, 22(2), 29-48. Rasyidin, D. (2016). Financing to deposit ratio (FDR) sebagai salah satu penilaian kesehatan bank umum syariah (Study kasus pada bank BJB syariah cabang Serang). Jurnal Ekonomi Keuangan dan Bisnis Islam, 7(1), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.32678/ijei.v7i1.34 Rohmana, Y. (2010). Ekonometrika teori dan aplikasi dengan eviews. Bandung: Laboratorium Pendidikan Ekonomi dan Koperasi. Sukmana, R., & Kholid, M. (2013). An assessment of liquidity policies with respect to Islamic and conventional banks: A case study of Indonesia. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 5(2), 126-138. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-09-2011-0023. Shim, J. (2013). Bank capital buffer and portfolio risk: The influence of business cycleand revenue diversification. Journal of Banking & Finance 37(3), 761–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.10.002 Siringoringo, R. (2012). Karakter dan fungsi intermediasi perbankan di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Moneter dan Perbankan, 15(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.21098/bemp.v15i1.57 Suryani, S., & Hendriyadi, H. (2015). Metode riset kuantitatf teoei dan aplikasi pada penelitian bidang manajemen dan ekonomi Islam. Jakarta: Prenadamedia. Tasman, A. (2020). Capital buffer dan faktor penentunya di Indonesia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Ekonomi, 10(2), 132-143. https://doi.org/10.24036/011098000 Taswan. (2010). Manajemen perbankan: Konsep, teknik dan aplikasi. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN Yogyakarta. Wibowo, B. (2016). Stabilitas bank, tingkat persaingan antar bank dan diversifikasi sumber pendapatan: Analisis perkelompok bank di Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi, 15(2), 172-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.12695/jmt.2016.15.2.5

Abstract:ABSTRACT: The Covid-19 pandemic that has occurred in the world has harmed economies since 2020, especially Indonesia. Therefore, it is very important to study the impact of this pandemic on the stability of Islamic banking in Indonesia and examine potential signs of post-pandemic recovery. This study examines the stability of Islamic banking in Indonesia. Stability is measured using ROA and Z-score. The data in this study are panel data for Islamic Commercial Banks (BUS) and Islamic Business Units (UUS). The data used is quarterly data for 2016-2020. This study uses the Generalized Method of Moment (GMM). The results of this study are ROA for Assets, CAR, FDR, and Covid-19 do not affect profits. However, NPF and BOPO have a negative effect. Whereas on the Z-score for Assets, CAR FDR has a positive effect. NPF and BOPO harm the stability of Islamic banking, except for Covid-19. Lower efficiency and problematic financing reduce the stability of Islamic banking. In addition, the results of our analysis, based on profitability and financial stability during the quarterly period, Islamic banking was able to survive during the Covid-19 pandemic. This research implies that even though some variables do not significantly affect profits, Islamic banks must still pay attention to other variables, such as ROA, owned assets, CAR, FDR, and Covid-19 which are likely to have a large negative impact on the long term. Apart from that, Islamic banks must also maintain profits and stability to survive and compete with conventional banking amid the Covid-19 pandemic. Keywords: Generalized Method of Moment, Islamic Bank, Banking Stability, Return on Assets, Z Score ABSTRAK: Pandemi Covid-19 yang terjadi di dunia memberikan dampak negatif bagi perekonomian sejak tahun 2020, khususnya Indonesia. Oleh karena itu, sangat penting untuk mengkaji dampak pandemi terhadap stabilitas perbankan syariah di Indonesia dan mengkaji potensi pemulihan pasca pandemi. Penelitian ini mengkaji tentang stabilitas perbankan syariah di Indonesia. Stabilitas diukur menggunakan ROA dan Z-score. Data dalam penelitian ini adalah data panel untuk Bank Umum Syariah (BUS) dan Unit Usaha Syariah (UUS). Data yang digunakan adalah data triwulanan tahun 2016-2020. Penelitian ini menggunakan Generalized Method of Moment (GMM). Hasil penelitian ini adalah ROA untuk Aset, CAR, FDR, dan Covid-19 tidak berpengaruh terhadap keuntungan perbankan syariah. Namun NPF dan BOPO berpengaruh negatif. Sedangkan pada Z-score untuk Aset, CAR FDR berpengaruh positif. NPF dan BOPO berpengaruh negatif terhadap stabilitas perbankan syariah, kecuali Covid-19. Efisiensi yang lebih rendah dan pembiayaan bermasalah mengurangi stabilitas perbankan syariah. Selain itu, hasil analisis, berdasarkan profitabilitas dan stabilitas keuangan selama periode triwulanan, perbankan syariah mampu bertahan selama pandemi. Hasilnya menunjukkan implikasi bahwa meskipun beberapa variabel tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap keuntungan, namun Bank Syariah harus tetap memperhatikan variabel lain, seperti ROA, Aset yang dimiliki, CAR, FDR, dan Covid-19 yang kemungkinan akan terjadi dampak negatif yang besar dalam jangka panjang. Selain itu, Bank Syariah juga harus mampu menjaga keuntungan dan stabilitas agar mampu bertahan dan bersaing dengan perbankan konvensional di tengah pandemi. Kata Kunci: Generalized Method of Moment, Perbankan Islam, Stabilitas Keuangan, Return on Assets, Z Score REFERENCES Abbas, F., Iqbal, S., & Aziz, B. (2019). The impact of bank capital, bank liquidity and credit risk on profitability in postcrisis period:‎ A comparative study of US and Asia. Cogent Economics and Finance, 7(1).doi:10.1080/23322039.2019.1605683 Aliyu, S., & Yusof, R. M. (2016). International journal of economics and financial issues profitability and cost efficiency of islamic banks: a panel analysis of some selected countries. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(4), 1736–1743. Alqahtani, F., & Mayes, D. G. (2018). Financial stability of islamic banking and the global financial crisis: Evidence from the Gulf Cooperation Council. Economic Systems, 42(2), 346–360.doi:10.1016/j.ecosys.2017.09.001 Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.doi:10.2307/2297968 Barzani, K. F. (2020). Profitability and risk in Indonesian islamic banking: A dynamic panel data analysis [Universitas Islam Indonesia]. Retrieved from https://dspace.uii.ac.id/123456789/30611 Ben Mimoun, M. (2019). Islamic banking and real performances in a dual banking system: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 12(3), 426–447.doi:10.1108/IMEFM-07-2018-0223 Berger, A. N., Boubakri, N., Guedhami, O., & Li, X. (2019). Liquidity creation performance and financial stability consequences of Islamic banking: Evidence from a multinational study. Journal of Financial Stability, 44, 100692.doi:10.1016/j.jfs.2019.100692 Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.doi:10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8 Elnahass, M., Trinh, V. Q., & Li, T. (2021). Global banking stability in the shadow of Covid-19 outbreak. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 72, 101322.doi:10.1016/j.intfin.2021.101322 Eng, T. S. (2013). Pengaruh NIM, BOPO, LDR, NPL, dan CAR terhadap ROA bank internasional dan bank nasional go public periode 2007 – 2011. Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen, 1(3), 153–167.doi:10.22437/jdm.v1i3.1473 Fakhruddin, Iwan dan Purwanti, T. (2015). Pengaruh rasio kesehatan bank terhadap kinerja keuangan bank periode 2010-2013. Jurnal Kompartemen, XIII(2), 116–131.doi:10.30595/kompartemen.v13i2.1768 Havidz, S. A. H., & Setiawan, C. (2015). Bank efficiency and non-performing financing (npf) in the indonesian islamic banks. Asian Journal of Economic Modelling, 3(3), 61–79.doi:10.18488/journal.8/2015.3.3/8.3.61.79 Horobet, A., Radulescu, M., Belascu, L., & Dita, S. M. (2021). Determinants of bank profitability in cee countries: Evidence from GMM panel data estimates. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(7), 307.doi:10.3390/jrfm14070307 Ilhami, & Thamrin, H. (2021). Analisis dampak Covid 19 terhadap kinerja keuangan perbankan syariah di Indonesia. Jurnal Tabarru’: Islamic Banking and Finance, 4(1), 37–45.doi:10.25299/jtb.2021.vol4(1).608 Kusumastuti, W. I., & Alam, A. (2019). Analysis of impact of CAR, NPF, BOPO on profitability of Islamic banks (year 2015-2017). Journal of Islamic Economic Laws, 2(1), 30–59.doi:10.23917/jisel.v2i1.6370 Lubis, K. A. (2013). Penerapan generalized method of moments pada persamaan simultan panel dinamis untuk pemodelan pertumbuhan ekonomi di Indonesia. Unpublished thesis. Institute Teknologi Sepuluh November. Thamrin, Liviawati, & Rita Wiyati. (2011). Analisis perbandingan kinerja keuangan bank umum sayriah dan bank umum konvensional serta pengaruhnya terhadap keputusan investasi. Pekbis Jurnal, 3(1), 406–412.doi:10.31258/pekbis.3.01.%p Maritsa, F. H. N., & Widarjono, A. (2021). Indonesian islamic banks and financial stability: An empirical analysis. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 5(1), 71–87.doi:10.14421/EkBis.2021.5.1.1279 Pravasanti, Y. A. (2018). Pengaruh NPF dan FDR terhadap CAR dan dampaknya terhadap ROA pada perbankan syariah di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 4(03), 148-159.doi:10.29040/jiei.v4i03.302 Primadita, N. (2020). Analisis pengaruh murabahah, mudharabah, musyarakah, FDR, NPF dan BOPO terhadap kinerja perbankan syariah tahun 2011-2020. Syi’ar Iqtishadi: Journal of Islamic Economics, Finance and Banking. 4(2), 36-58. doi:10.35448/jiec.v4i2.9843 Raouf, H., & Ahmed, H. (2021). Risk governance and financial stability: A comparative study of conventional and islamic banks in the GCC. Global Finance Journal,52, 100599.doi:10.1016/j.gfj.2020.100599 Rashid, A., & Jabeen, S. (2016). Analyzing performance determinants: Conventional versus islamic banks in Pakistan. Borsa Istanbul Review, 16(2), 92–107.doi:10.1016/j.bir.2016.03.002 Rizvi, S. A. R., Narayan, P. K., Sakti, A., & Syarifuddin, F. (2020). Role of islamic banks in Indonesian banking industry: An empirical exploration. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 62.doi:10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.02.002 Salike, N., & Ao, B. (2018). Determinants of bank’s profitability: Role of poor asset quality in Asia. China Finance Review International, 8(2), 216–231.doi:10.1108/CFRI-10-2016-0118 Suryani. (2012). Analisis pengaruh financing to deposit ratio (FDR) terhadap profitabilitas perbankan syariah di Indonesia (rasio keuangan pada BUS dan UUS Periode 2008-2010). Economica: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 2(2), 153–170.doi:10.21580/economica.2012.2.2.854 Tahliani, H. (2020). Tantangan perbankan syariah dalam menghadapi pandemi Covid-19. Madani Syari’ah, 3(2), 92–113.doi:10.51476/madanisyari'ah.v3i2.205 Taurif, M., Otok, B. W., & Latra, I. N. (2014). Estimation of generalized method of moment in logistic regression model. Proceeding of Seminar Nasional Matematika, Universitas Jember:19 November. Page 167–174. Widarjono, A. (2020). Stability of islamic banks in Indonesia: Autoregressive distributed lag approach. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan, 24(1), 40–52.doi:10.26905/jkdp.v24i1.3932 Widarjono, A., Mifrahi, M. N., & Perdana, A. R. A. (2020). Determinants of Indonesian islamic rural banks’ profitability: Collusive or non-collusive behavior?. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(11), 657–668.doi:10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no11.657 Youssef, A. H., El-Sheikh, A. A., & Abonazel, M. R. (2014). Improving the efficiency of GMM estimators for dynamic panel models. Far East Journal of Theoretical Statistics ,47(2),171-189. Zarrouk, H., Ben Jedidia, K., & Moualhi, M. (2016). Is islamic bank profitability driven by same forces as conventional banks?. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 9(1), 46–66.doi:10.1108/IMEFM-12-2014-0120

The Impact of Total Bank Assets, Income Diversification, and Financial Inclusion on the Stability of Islamic Commercial Banks in Indonesia With a Moderating Variable for the 2014-2019 Capital Buffer

The Impact of Credit Diversification on Credit Risk and Performance of Indonesian Banks

The Influence Of Risk Management On Financial Performance With Firm Size As A Moderating Variable In Islamic Commercial Banks For The Period 2017-2021

PENGARUH DIVERSIFIKASI PENDAPATAN, UKURAN BANK DAN KOMPETISI BANK TERHADAP PROFITABILITAS BANK UMUM SYARIAH

The Influence of Productive Asset Quality, Loan to Deposit Ratio, Non Performing Loan, and Operating Expenses to Operating Income on Profit with Capital Adequacy Ratio as Moderating Variable in Indonesian Banking

Determinants of Islamic bank stability in Asia

Determinan Capital Buffers Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia

Indonesia Islamic Banking Stability in The Shadow of Covid-19 Outbreak

Comparative stability analysis of Indonesian banks: Markov Switching—Dynamic Regression for Islamic and conventional sectors

Implementation of Risk Management and Capital Structure on Financial Performance: A Study of Islamic Banking in Indonesia

Determinant Of Sharia Bank Indonesia Rate With Financing And Deposit In Indonesian Islamic Banking Asset

ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF ASSET QUALITY, LIQUIDITY, AND CAPITAL ON PROFITABILITY

Bank maturity, income diversification, and bank stability

Determination Profitability of Islamic Banks with Exchange Rate as Moderating Variable

The effect of asset quality, profit and loss sharing on Sharia Banking Liquidity in Indonesia

Financial Inclusion and Bank Profitability: Evidence from Indonesia

Islamic banks and capital buffer behavior: A view from the Gulf cooperation council markets

Bank financing diversification, market structure, and stability in a dual-banking system

The impact of credit and liquidity risk on bank financial performance: the case of Indonesian Conventional Bank with total asset above 10 trillion Rupiah

Activity Diversification, Performance, And Profitability In Islamic Banking

Impact of Diversification on Bank Stability: Evidence from Emerging and Developing Countries