Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Nicole Stephanie Pichardo-Loera,Claudia Corredor-Ortega,Miguel Angel Castro-Monreal,Martha Gabriela Massaro-Corredor,José Francisco Pérez-Vázquez,Roberto Gonzalez-Salinas
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721241229129
2024-01-31
European Journal of Ophthalmology
Abstract:European Journal of Ophthalmology, Ahead of Print. PurposeThe main purpose of our study is to compare the adverse events occurrence, complications, and postoperative outcomes of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery (FLACS) versus conventional phacoemulsification surgery (CPS) in adult patients undergoing cataract surgery.MethodsWe conducted our research using PubMed, Scopus, and MEDLINE through EBSCOhost from 2012 to July 2022 with English and Spanish language restriction, including only Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs). The PRISMA guidelines were observed for data abstraction, including a random-effects model for each outcome.ResultsWe analyzed 4844 eyes from 23 RCTs with some low risk of bias according to RoB 2 tool. We found statistically significant differences between the FLACS and CPS groups for the mean absolute error (MD = −0.12, 95% CI:−0.22–[−0.02], p = 0.01), the circularity of capsulorhexis (MD = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.04–0.05, p ≤ 0.00001), IOL centration (D = −0.07, 95% CI:−0.09–[−0.05], p ≤ 0.00001), CDE count (MD = −1.75, 95% CI: −2.75-[−0.74], p = 0.0006), mean phacoemulsification time (MD = -12.90, 95% CI:−20.89-[−4.92], p = 0.002), EPT (MD = −0.93, 95% CI: −1.68-[−0.019], p = 0.01) and endothelial cell density loss ((MD = −0.6, 95% CI: −1-[−0.19], p = 0.004). Also, the safety analysis showed a lower incidence of posterior capsule tear (PCT) in the FLACS group (OR =0.29, 95% CI: 0.09–1, p = 0.05).ConclusionsOur results suggest that FLACS might be helpful for patients with relatively dense cataracts and low preoperative endothelial cell values.
ophthalmology