Abstract:Background and aims: Adenoma miss rate during colonoscopy is directly linked to risk of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer. One of the reasons for missed adenomas is poor visualization of proximal folds during standard colonoscopy withdrawal. Disposable distal attachments such as the plastic cap and Endocuff (Arc Medical Design, Leeds, UK) that hold back folds appear to improve adenoma detection. The primary aim of this study was to compare adenoma detection rates between Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy (EAC) and cap-assisted colonoscopy (CAC). Methods: This is a randomized, single-center, tandem colonoscopy trial performed by the same endoscopists on the same day, first with Endocuff Vision (Arc Medical Design, Leeds, UK) followed by cap or vice versa. All procedures were performed by 3 experienced gastroenterology fellows. Results: One hundred fifty-four patients were recruited. Seventy-eight (50.6%) had CAC as their first procedure. Mean patient age was 61 years (male-to-female ratio, 1:1). Adenoma detection rate was significantly higher for EAC when compared to CAC (53% vs 26%, P = .001). Polyp miss rate was significantly lower in EAC (8.4%) compared with CAC (26.1%, P < .001) as was adenoma miss rate (EAC vs CAC, 6%, vs 19%; P = .002) and diminutive adenoma (<5 mm) miss rate in the EAC group (1.8% vs 19.6%, P < .001). However, there was no significant differences in the miss rates for small adenomas (5-9 mm) (3.7% vs 2.9%, P = .69) or adenomas 10 mm or larger (1.6% vs 2.6%, P = .98 ). The mean number of adenomas per procedure was significantly higher with EAC compared with CAC (1.5 vs .8, P < .001). Cecal intubation time was significantly shorter with EAC than CAC (median 6 vs 7 minutes, P = .01). Conversely, withdrawal time (median 10 vs 8 minutes, P = .01) was significantly longer in EAC. Conclusions: This randomized, tandem study demonstrates that EAC has a significantly higher adenoma detection rate and lower adenoma miss rate than CAC. Although insertion times were shorter with EAC, procedures were slightly more uncomfortable, and the cuff had to be removed in a small number of cases. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03254498.).

New Developments in Mechanical Enhancement of Colonoscopy: Cuffs, Caps and Rings

Colon capsule endoscopy: What we know and what we would like to know

Multicenter, randomized, tandem evaluation of EndoRings colonoscopy--results of the CLEVER study

Endoscopic cuff-assisted colonoscopy versus cap-assisted colonoscopy in adenoma detection: randomized tandem study-DEtection in Tandem Endocuff Cap Trial (DETECT)

Higher Adenoma Detection Rates with Endocuff-Assisted Colonoscopy – A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial

Endocuff®-assisted colonoscopy increases polyp detection rate: a simulated randomized study involving an anatomic colorectal model and 32 international endoscopists

Robotic Colonoscopy and Beyond: Insights into Modern Lower Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Mo1563 CAP-Assisted Colonoscopy Versus Standard Colonoscopy in Polyp Detection and Cecal Intubation Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised-Controlled Trials

Second-generation distal attachment cuff for adenoma detection in screening colonoscopy: a randomized multicenter study

Randomized controlled trial of EndoRings assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy

The impact of EndoCuff-assisted colonoscopy on the polyp detection rate: A cross-over randomized back-to-back study

Comparison of colon adenoma detection rates using cap-assisted and Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial

Cap-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy: is the cap beneficial? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

New endoscopy advances to refine adenoma detection rate for colorectal cancer screening: None is the winner

Clinical utility of colon capsule endoscopy: a moving target?

Image enhanced colonoscopy: updates and prospects-a review

Cuff-assisted versus cap-assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection: results of a randomized study

Endocuff With Or Without Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colonoscopy In Detection Of Colorectal Adenoma: A Randomized Colonoscopy Trial

Standard versus Endocuff versus cap-assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection: A randomised controlled clinical trial

Colon capsule endoscopy: detection of colonic polyps compared with conventional colonoscopy and visualization of extracolonic pathologies

Colon capsule endoscopy: Advantages, limitations and expectations. Which novelties?