Abstract:The Grand Strategy of the United States, including its strategy toward China, has always been the product of the interaction of geopolitics and domestic politics. After the Cold War, with the end of the bipolar structure of the international system and the increasing polarization of domestic politics in the United States, the impact of geopolitics on the formulation of the foreign policy of the United States has been weakened to some degree, while the spillover effect of domestic politics has weighed more heavily than before. This change could be explained in the way that while two opposing trends of Partisan Realignment began to emerge in the post-financial crisis era in the United States, the elites from both Democratic and Republican Parties had often focused on the preferences of their core political coalition as basis in foreign policy making, in order to further their own respective political interests. In regard to the American strategy toward China, with the deepening of the structural contradictions between China and the United States as well as changes in their respective external strategic choices, geopolitics became the primary logic in the formulation of American strategy toward China since 2009, thus the “strategic competition” has become the dominant mode of bilateral relations. In the view of Washington, China and the United States have formed a competitive relationship in the areas relating to the core interests of the United States, such as economy, security, values and the dominance of the existing international order. However, the questions of reality, such as how to compete with China and how to decide the priorities of their own core interests, are defined by demands of core political coalitions represented by the elites from both Democratic and Republican Parties in the context of a new round of Partisan Realignment. From Obama to Trump, different domestic political logics made the focus of American strategy toward China shifted from “institution–values” competition based on globalism to “economy–security” competition based on nationalism. Therefore, the changes in American domestic politics will present an important channel through which the orientation of American strategy toward China would be clearly observed in the future.

COVID, Democratic Fallout Versus New National Humiliation: China’s Perception and Strategy in the Middle East

Dimensions of rivalry: China, the United States, and Europe

The Politics of Blaming: the Narrative Battle between China and the US over COVID-19

The domestic resonance of geopolitical competition in American foreign policy: the rise of China and post-war US–Soviet relations compared

Reflections on China–US relations after the COVID-19 pandemic

From Partnership to Rivalry: China and the USA in the Early Twenty-First Century

The United States in a World of Great Power Competition

Is Nationalism Crucial in China-US Relations? —evidence from a Comparative Analysis

Fear the fear: the historical analogies of COVID-19 in US–China relations

Bipolar Rivalry in the Early Digital Age

Russian Perspectives on US–China Relations and the Twenty-First-Century Global System

Rise of China: War on Hegemony; How China is an Influential Actor in the Hegemonic Race with the United States

The future of US-China relations: a scientific investigation

The COVID-19 Health Crisis and Its Impact on China’s International Relations

An Opportunistic Russia in the Middle East, a View from China

The limitations of strategic narratives: The Sino-American struggle over the meaning of COVID-19

The geopolitics of anti-Asian racism: A critical discourse analysis of dominant Western narratives on China in the COVID-19 era

Coercive China, deterrent China

Defining China–US Strategic Competition: Partisan Realignment and the Domestic Political Logic of Change in American Strategy Toward China, 2009–2020

Geostrategy and Great Power Relations: A Reanalysis of the Basic Trends of Sino-Japanese Relations

Cold War Discourse and Geopolitical Flashpoints in Post-Covid-19 Northeast Asia