Abstract:OBJECTIVES: There are similarities between the different forms of reliability, such as internal consistency (internal reliability) and interrater and intrarater reliability. Reliability coefficients that are based on classical test theory can be expressed as intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), such as Cronbach's alpha. The Spearman-Brown prophecy formula (SB formula) is used to calculate the reliability when the number of items in a questionnaire is changed. This paper aims to increase insight into reliability studies by pointing to the assumptions of reliability coefficients, similarities between various coefficients, and the subsequent new applications of reliability coefficients.DESIGN, SETTINGS AND RESULTS: The origin and assumptions of Cronbach's alpha and the SB formula are discussed. Cronbach's alpha is written as an ICC formula, using the well-known property that taking the average value of a number of ratings increases the reliability of a measurement. We illustrate with an example that the ICC formulas for average measurements of multiple raters and the SB formula give similar results. This implies that the SB formula can be used to decide on the number of measurements to be averaged and thus on the number of raters required, for obtaining measurements with acceptable reliability, even if the variance components of the ICC formula are not known. Using the same example, we illustrate the principle of "Cronbach's alpha if item deleted" to decide on the poorest performing raters in a set of raters.CONCLUSION: These applications have different assumptions: the principle of "Cronbach's alpha if item deleted" is based on the assumption of a fixed set of items/raters and the SB formula is based on the assumption of random raters. The example also emphasizes the need for more raters in the design of the reliability study to obtain a robust estimation of reliability.

Rethinking Internal Consistency in Cronbach's Alpha

Rethinking Internal Consistency in Cronbach's Alpha

Cronbach's Alpha: Review of Limitations and Associated Recommendations

The alpha and the omega of scale reliability and validity: why and how to abandon Cronbach’s alpha and the route towards more comprehensive assessment of scale quality

Alpha, Omega, and H Internal Consistency Reliability Estimates: Reviewing These Options and When to Use Them

On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha

Starting at the Beginning: An Introduction to Coefficient Alpha and Internal Consistency

Treating Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficients as Data in Counseling Research

Reliability, Dimensionality, and Internal Consistency as Defined by Cronbach: Distinct Albeit Related Concepts

Robust estimation of Cronbach's alpha

Choosing Between Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha, McDonald's Coefficient Omega, and Coefficient H: Confidence Intervals and the Advantages and Drawbacks of Interpretive Guidelines

Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha

Cronbach's alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning

Spearman–Brown prophecy formula and Cronbach's alpha: different faces of reliability and opportunities for new applications

Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient -

Sample Size in Reliability Studies: A Practical Guide Based on Cronbach's Alpha

From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation

Reliability reconsidered: Cronbach's alpha and paediatric assessment in occupational therapy

The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education