DILEMMAS OF POWER AND LEADERSHIP IN A PLURALISTIC WORLD
Mykola Karaschuk,,Mykola Lipin,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2415-881x.2024.92.268-289
2024-01-01
Politology bulletin
Abstract:The article is dedicated to exploring the reasons for the actualization of leadership discourse in the contemporary pluralistic, fluid, and turbulent world. It reveals the interconnection of leadership with power, domination, and identity. The methodological limitation of interpreting leadership in the context of domination is outlined. It is argued that the actualization of demand for leadership is driven by the complexity of social-cultural, political, and economic transformations in the fluid world, leading to the emergence of a peculiar paradox: the more disorganized and undefined social reality becomes, the more demand arises for the ability of individuals and collectives for self-organization, self-activity, and selfdetermination. However, simultaneously, there is a search for simple answers to the complex challenges of the turbulent world. One way to escape the burden of freedom is the search for “true” leaders to whom the duty of seeking meaning in one’s own existence and the direction of personal development can be delegated. The goal of the article is an attempt to reconsider leadership as a space for human development in its interaction with others, as a relationship among three subjects (leader, followers, and the matter) in which the potential of all involved in this process is realized. The achievement of the stated goal was pursued by relying on conceptual studies of the essence of the leadership phenomenon by domestic and foreign researchers. The research is based on the principles of such methodological approaches as critical, interdisciplinary, systemic, and comparative analysis, as well as on the general scientific principles of objectivity and historicism. The transformation of democratic politics into a process of technological administration devalues the significance of the public sphere in citizens’ everyday existence. They lose the opportunity, ability, and ultimately the desire to participate in political life. Thus, the demand for a strong leader today may indicate the depoliticization of the globalized world.