Abstract:In 1966 Francis Crick declared that: "The ultimate aim of the modern movement in biology is to explain all biology in terms of physics and chemistry." This motivated us to contemplate approaches that unify biology at a fundamental level. Exploration led us to consider the features of energy, entropy, and motion. Overall, it can be considered that motion of matter is the feature of life function. No motion. No function. In initial work we evaluated the hypothesis that the scope for biologic function is mediated mechanistically by a differential for energy transfer. Maximal treadmill running capacity served as a proxy for energy transfer. The span for capacity was estimated "biologically" by application of two-way artificial selection in rats for running capacity. Consistent with our "Energy Transfer Hypothesis" (ETH), low physical health and dysfunction segregated with low running capacity and high physical health and function segregated with high running capacity. The high energy yield of aerobic metabolism is also consonant with the ETH; that is, amongst the elements of the universe, oxygen is second only to fluorine in electronegativity. Although we deem these energy findings possibly correct, they are based on correlation and do not illuminate function via fundamental principles. For consideration of life, Entropy (2nd Law of thermodynamics) can be viewed as an open system that exchanges energy with the universe operating via nonequilibrium thermodynamics. The Principle of Maximal Entropy Production (MEP) states that: If a source of free energy is present, complex systems can intercept the free energy flow, and self-organize to enhance entropy production. The development of Benard convection cells in a water heat gradient demonstrate simplistic operation of MEP. A direct step forward would be to explain the mechanism of the obligatory motion of molecules for life function. Motion may be mediated by operation of "action at a distance" for molecules as considered by the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox and confirmed by JS Bell. Magnetism, electricity, and gravity are also examples of action at a distance. We propose that some variant of "action at a distance" as directed by the property of Maximal Entropy Production (MEP) underwrites biologic motion.

Intercellular signaling through secreted proteins induces free-energy gradient-directed cell movement

The Forces behind Directed Cell Migration

Single cell migration along and against confined haptotactic gradients

Spatiotemporal dynamics of membrane surface charge regulates cell polarity and migration

Systemic cellular migration: The forces driving the directed locomotion movement of cells

Why epithelial cells collectively move against a traveling signal wave

Optimality of intercellular signaling: Direct transport versus diffusion

Two Complementary Signaling Pathways Depict Eukaryotic Chemotaxis: A Mechanochemical Coupling Model

Forces directing the systemic correlations of cell migration

Endoplasmic reticulum–plasma membrane contact gradients direct cell migration

On the energy efficiency of cell migration in diverse physical environments

Progress and perspectives in signal transduction, actin dynamics, and movement at the cell and tissue level: lessons from Dictyostelium

Emergent collective chemotaxis without single-cell gradient sensing

Geometry-Sensitive Protrusion Growth Directs Confined Cell Migration

Compartmentalized Cytoplasmic Flows Direct Protein Transport to the Cell's Leading Edge

Cellular tango: How extracellular matrix adhesion choreographs Rac-Rho signaling and cell movement

Signal transduction and directional sensing in eukaryotes

Biology: Motion is Function

Interplay Between Chemotaxis and Contact Inhibition of Locomotion Determines Exploratory Cell Migration

Long range juxtacrine signalling through cadherin for collective cell orientation