The Act of Murder: Renaissance Tragedy and the Detective Novel

Esme Miskimmin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137319401_18
2013-01-01
Abstract:Dorothy L. Sayers’s address, ‘Aristotle on Detective Fiction’, given at Oxford in 1935 and later published in her volume of critical essays, Unpopular Opinions (1946) is a clever, light-hearted argument for Aristotle’s appreciation of a good murder-mystery and his apparent anticipation of an entire genre. It also serves as a useful introduction to this discussion, establishing a link between two potentially disparate subgenres, crime fiction and Renaissance tragedy, and highlighting some of the issues raised in the process of examining one in the light of the other. The application of Aristotelian theory to Renaissance drama is not a new subject for discussion, but in exploring Aristotle’s arguments with reference to the genre of detective fiction, Sayers’s essay encourages us to reflect on the uses that some twentieth-century crime-writers make of the works of Shakespeare and his contemporaries. It also potentially invites another reapplication of some genre-based narrative theory, a reconsideration of Todorov and Auden’s seminal essays on detective fiction with a view to exploring drama.2 Using these three essays as a framework, this chapter will consider how we might identify some examples of the ‘pre-genre’ detective story in Renaissance tragedy as well as address the ways in which Sayers and other writers of the British ‘classic’ or ‘traditional’ detective story utilize Renaissance drama in their prose.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?